FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™

Encyclopedia of Latest news, reviews, discussions and analysis of stock market and investment opportunities in Sri Lanka

LISTED COMPANIES

Submit Post


ADVERTISE
Poll

EXCHANGE RATE PREDICTION: 2022

 
 
 
 

View results

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මූල්‍ය වංශකථාව - සිංහල
Submit Post


CONATCT US


Send your suggestions and comments

* - required fields

Read FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ Disclaimer



Latest topics

» AAIC Next multibugger- destnation beyond EXPO.
by ADVENTUS Today at 2:14 am

» RENUKA AGRI FOODS PLC (RAL.N0000) TP. 7
by Cma Today at 2:08 am

» Sri Lankan Port Transshipment Hub Threats & Opportunities
by rajini Today at 12:53 am

» LANKA INDIAN OIL CORPORATION - Maharaja
by Maharaja Yesterday at 11:07 pm

» ACL; MELS; HHL; BIL; LWL- STOCKS TO WATCH
by Dilshan2020 Yesterday at 10:39 pm

» AAIC 100 = SCAP 16
by SamJay1974 Yesterday at 8:12 pm

» SUNSHINE HOLDINGS PLC (SUN.N0000)
by ADVENTUS Yesterday at 8:02 pm

» APLA - Very very undervalued share - Target Price
by Jana Yesterday at 7:07 pm

» HAYLEYS PLC (HAYL.N0000)
by Chamath1980 Yesterday at 5:07 pm

» New Bermuda Triangle
by rajini Yesterday at 2:17 pm

» BOGAWANTALAWA TEA ESTATES PLC (BOPL.N0000)
by cheetah Yesterday at 6:33 am

» Technical update 12.08.2022 Maharaja
by Maharaja Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:04 pm

» Exterminators Plc (EXT.N)
by ErangaDS Mon Aug 15, 2022 9:09 pm

» ALLIANCE FINANCE COMPANY PLC (ALLI.N0000)
by Gaudente Mon Aug 15, 2022 8:08 pm

» GREAT OPPORTUNITIES FOR EVERYONE-
by ADVENTUS Mon Aug 15, 2022 5:12 pm

» LOLC to enter the giant Indian Market
by samaritan Mon Aug 15, 2022 4:52 pm

» Hidden Gem - GLAS - 40/- Soon
by vijay singh Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:36 am

» Buy lofc tomorrow - Maharaja
by Anushka Perz Mon Aug 15, 2022 12:59 am

» LIOC ....Get in soon
by Citizen Silva Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:26 pm

» L G I L - Maharaja special
by Chula Sun Aug 14, 2022 10:12 pm

EXPERT CHRONICLE™

MARKET CHAT


CHRONICLE™ ANALYTICS


ECONOMIC CHRONICLE

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)


CHRONICLE™ YouTube

LATEST TWEETS

You are not connected. Please login or register

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ » CORPORATE CHRONICLE™ » Conduct known as "gun-jumping."and so-called "cooling-off" period. Don't Jump the Gun

Conduct known as "gun-jumping."and so-called "cooling-off" period. Don't Jump the Gun

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Asoka Samarakone


Expert
Expert

Conduct known as "gun-jumping."and so-called "cooling-off" period.
Don't Jump the Gun
By RiskMetrics Group on June 4, 2004 12:10 PM
It doesn't happen too often, but every year or so a company preparing to go public derails itself, at least temporarily, by getting too close to conduct known as "gun-jumping." The most recent example of this is salesforce.com, which apparently had planned to go public on May 13.
"Gun-jumping" generally refers to actions that condition the public mind or arouse public interest in an issuer or in the securities of an issuer in advance of a public offering. As I discussed in this article several years ago, gun-jumping can occur after a company has filed a registration statement and is in the waiting period between filing and effectiveness. Although oral offers may be made during this period, Section 5(b)(1) of the Securities Act requires that written offers be made through the preliminary prospectus filed with the registration statement. Thus, written "offers" that do not meet the requirements of a preliminary prospectus (or a tombstone ad pursuant to Rule 134 under the Securities Act) may be in violation of Section 5(b)(1). Notably, the SEC takes a broad view of what constitutes an "offer," and has stated that any publicity that has the effect of "conditioning the public mind or arousing public interest in the issuer or in the securities of an issuer" may be deemed part of the selling effort.
When the SEC comes across conduct such as interviews or news stories that it deems to be gun-jumping, it typically requires the company that is poised to go public to delay its IPO through a so-called "cooling-off" period. The cooling-off period theoretically allows the "aroused public interest" to dissipate, and permits the company to argue that its IPO, when it finally does occur, is "offered" only through the prospectus and not through some other written materials such as a news article.
In addition, as discussed by Broc Romanek in his blog on May 25, the SEC also commonly requires that a risk factor be included in the company's IPO prospectus regarding the potential gun-jumping violation. The reason for this risk factor is that the consequences of gun-jumping can be dramatic: Under Section 12 of the Securities Act, any person who offers or sells a security in violation of Section 5 is civilly liable to the purchaser of that security for the full amount paid for the security, plus interest. Thus, a company that violates Section 5 may have unwittingly written the equivalent of a "put" contract guaranteeing that it will buy back its securities at the price at which it sold them.
Indeed, as discussed in this article, salesforce.com delayed its IPO following certain comments by its CEO in the New York Times in the days leading up to the offering, and then added a risk factor in this amended prospectus explaining that:
If our involvement in a lengthy May 9th New York Times article about salesforce.com or any other publicity regarding salesforce.com or the offering during the waiting period were held to be "gun jumping" in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, we could be required to repurchase securities sold in this offering. You should only rely on statements made in this prospectus in determining whether to purchase our shares.
The disclosure added:
In order to reduce the risk of investors' possible reliance on the New York Times article and other news reports and articles, we stopped our offering on May 13, 2004. We then allowed a "cooling off" period to pass so that the effect of this article and other reports, articles and information would be dissipated.
It is uncertain whether our involvement in the May 9th New York Times article or any of our other publicity related activities could be held to be a violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933. If our involvement or such activities were held by a court to be in violation of the Securities Act, we could be required to repurchase the shares sold to purchasers in this offering at the original purchase price for a period of one year following the date of the violation. We would contest vigorously any claim that a violation of the Securities Act occurred.
http://blog.issgovernance.com/slw/2004/06/dont-jump-the-gun.html

Redbulls

Redbulls
Director - Equity Analytics
Director - Equity Analytics

In Srilanka gun jumping 30 years and cooling off almost 3 years.

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum