FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™

Encyclopedia of Latest news, reviews, discussions and analysis of stock market and investment opportunities in Sri Lanka

LISTED COMPANIES

Submit Post

Poll

Can there be another Covid-19 wave in Sri Lanka?

 
 
 

View results

STOCK MARKET TRAINING
ශ්‍රී ලංකා මූල්‍ය වංශකථාව - සිංහල
Submit Post


CONATCT US


Send your suggestions and comments

* - required fields

Read FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ Disclaimer



Latest topics

» L B Finance PLC (LFIN.N0000) - (1st Interim dividend for 1Q 2022)
by Venu123 Today at 11:28 am

» PIRAMAL GLASS CEYLON PLC (GLAS.N0000)
by sandamal Today at 11:07 am

» ROYAL CERAMICS PLC (RCL.N0000)
by KILLER99 Today at 10:17 am

» EXPOLANKA HOLDINGS PLC (EXPO.N0000)
by ONTHEMONEY Yesterday at 11:49 pm

» SEMB the ASPH
by soileconomy Yesterday at 9:31 pm

» Browns bullish on investments in local, international hotels
by SAGA Yesterday at 8:23 pm

» Top Foreign Trading today
by SAGA Yesterday at 8:20 pm

» Sell EXPO Buy EDEN sentiment changed to Exit EXPO Enter EDEN
by ADVENTUS Yesterday at 4:45 pm

» Top crossings today
by SAGA Yesterday at 2:53 pm

» LAUGFS GAS PLC (LGL.N0000)
by Wickyz Yesterday at 2:06 pm

» Sri Lanka’s 213 billion rupee money printing to repay foreign debt: Treasury Secretary explains
by CITIZEN Yesterday at 11:25 am

» Oman shows interest in SLAF HQ land and Chalmer’s Granary
by dayandacool Yesterday at 11:03 am

» HVA FOODS PLC (HVA.N0000)
by prabath Yesterday at 10:05 am

» EXPOLANKA HOLDINGS PLC Interim Financial Statements quarter ended 30th June 2021
by mah2903 Yesterday at 2:59 am

» ලාභ ගන්න කොටස් වලින් මේක සම්පූර්ණයෙන්ම කියවන්න
by ColomboCSE Yesterday at 12:37 am

» Shares to Buy
by Cma Yesterday at 12:02 am

» Successful investment strategies require an understanding of the forces of stock market nature, and disciplined rules of portfolio management.
by Asoka Samarakone Sat Jul 31, 2021 9:12 pm

» LANKA ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PLC (LALU.N0000)
by Niwa Sat Jul 31, 2021 8:53 pm

» Directors' Dealings today
by SAGA Sat Jul 31, 2021 6:02 pm

» CHEVRON LUBRICANTS LANKA PLC (LLUB.N0000)
by Antonym Sat Jul 31, 2021 5:37 pm

EXPERT CHRONICLE™

MARKET CHAT


CHRONICLE™ ANALYTICS


ECONOMIC CHRONICLE

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)


CHRONICLE™ YouTube

LATEST TWEETS

You are not connected. Please login or register

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ » DAILY CHRONICLE™ » PAC dragging its feet - CB using EPF to invest in banking stocks

PAC dragging its feet - CB using EPF to invest in banking stocks

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

sriranga

sriranga
Co-Admin
UNP economic spokesman Dr. Harsha De Silva, MP, charged that the Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) was dragging its feet on controversies surrounding the Central Bank using the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) to invest in banking stocks, which left room for a possible conflict of interest, insider trading and erosion of investor sentiments as the government and its cronies continue to gain from the deals.

"I had sent a letter to the Chairman of the PAC, Dr. Sarath Amunugama (Senior Minister of International Financial Cooperation), last January asking for the committee to summon officials of the Central Bank to answer burning questions regarding its involvement in both administrating the EPF and using it to invest in stocks of banks and financial institutions it was regulating. Up to now, nothing has happened and the government and its cronies continue to gain from these controversial transactions," Dr. De Silva said, addressing a news conference last morning, a day after a damning review released by international ratings agency Standard and Poor’s.

"Dr. Amunugama and DEW Gunasekara (Chairman of the Committee on Public Enterprises) have both made significant contributions to improving governance, but the PAC is dragging its feet and is yet to summon the Central Bank to answer to the Parliament. The questions we have are relevant because the EPF is not the government’s, nor the Central Bank’s, private property, but the hard earned monies of our workers. It is my money and your money. It is the people’s money and they have the right to know how it is being invested," Dr. De Silva said.

According to an ‘Investment Policy and Standards of Professional Conduct’ formulated by the Central Bank in 2002, it was deemed necessary not to allow the EPF invest in banking stocks for legal implications that could arise such as the possibility of conflict of interest, insider trading and being open to SEC regulation. However, this was changed in 2009.

The Central Bank has time and time again explained its stance on the EPF issue, going as far as to accuse Dr. De Silva of trying to destabilise the financial system.

"I am not the one who is trying to destabilise the financial system. The Central Bank and government’s own actions have already done that," he said referring to the recent review of the economy and banking system by Standard and Poor’s (see yesterday’s The Island Financial Review).

Standard and Poor’s (S&P) said the economy and banking system was at high risk and when on to deliver a blow to the Central Bank: "Our industry risk score of ‘7’ for Sri Lanka is based on our opinion that the country faces "very high risk" in its institutional framework, "high risk" in its competitive dynamics, and "intermediate risk" in its system-wide funding.

"We view the banking regulations in Sri Lanka as somewhat weaker than international standards. Governance and transparency of banks are weak by global standards. Sri Lanka adopted a standardized approach of Basel II in 2008, with capital requirements higher than global requirements. The key regulations for banks seem sufficient. However, finance companies are less regulated, in our view. This is despite the December 2008 collapse of a finance company triggering a run on a bank in that group."

S&P further said that under the existing legislation, banks in Sri Lanka are subject to on-site examinations by the banking sector regulator at least once every two years, which is not adequate.

"We believe the frequency of on-site supervision may not be sufficient for the regulator to quickly detect risk build-ups. Moreover, we see a potential conflict of interest in the central bank’s role. In addition to policy formulation and supervision of banks, the monetary board of the central bank also oversees Employees’ Provident Fund investments. The fund is a large investor in Sri Lankan banking stocks," S&P said.

Dr. De Silva said such reviews were damaging investor confidence.

"The government should not shoot the messenger but focus its energies in improving good governance, transparency and macroeconomic management," he said.
http://www.island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=54884

http://sharemarket-srilanka.blogspot.co.uk/

Malika1990

Malika1990
Senior Vice President - Equity Analytics
Senior Vice President - Equity Analytics
Dr. De Silva

UNP economic spokesman Dr. Harsha De Silva, MP, charged that the Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) was dragging its feet on controversies surrounding the Central Bank using the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) to invest in banking stocks, which left room for a possible conflict of interest, insider trading and erosion of investor sentiments as the government and its cronies continue to gain from the deals.

"I had sent a letter to the Chairman of the PAC, Dr. Sarath Amunugama (Senior Minister of International Financial Cooperation), last January asking for the committee to summon officials of the Central Bank to answer burning questions regarding its involvement in both administrating the EPF and using it to invest in stocks of banks and financial institutions it was regulating. Up to now, nothing has happened and the government and its cronies continue to gain from these controversial transactions," Dr. De Silva said, addressing a news conference last morning, a day after a damning review released by international ratings agency Standard and Poor’s.

"Dr. Amunugama and DEW Gunasekara (Chairman of the Committee on Public Enterprises) have both made significant contributions to improving governance, but the PAC is dragging its feet and is yet to summon the Central Bank to answer to the Parliament. The questions we have are relevant because the EPF is not the government’s, nor the Central Bank’s, private property, but the hard earned monies of our workers. It is my money and your money. It is the people’s money and they have the right to know how it is being invested," Dr. De Silva said.

According to an ‘Investment Policy and Standards of Professional Conduct’ formulated by the Central Bank in 2002, it was deemed necessary not to allow the EPF invest in banking stocks for legal implications that could arise such as the possibility of conflict of interest, insider trading and being open to SEC regulation. However, this was changed in 2009.

The Central Bank has time and time again explained its stance on the EPF issue, going as far as to accuse Dr. De Silva of trying to destabilise the financial system.

"I am not the one who is trying to destabilise the financial system. The Central Bank and government’s own actions have already done that," he said referring to the recent review of the economy and banking system by Standard and Poor’s (see yesterday’s The Island Financial Review).

Standard and Poor’s (S&P) said the economy and banking system was at high risk and when on to deliver a blow to the Central Bank: "Our industry risk score of ‘7’ for Sri Lanka is based on our opinion that the country faces "very high risk" in its institutional framework, "high risk" in its competitive dynamics, and "intermediate risk" in its system-wide funding.

"We view the banking regulations in Sri Lanka as somewhat weaker than international standards. Governance and transparency of banks are weak by global standards. Sri Lanka adopted a standardized approach of Basel II in 2008, with capital requirements higher than global requirements. The key regulations for banks seem sufficient. However, finance companies are less regulated, in our view. This is despite the December 2008 collapse of a finance company triggering a run on a bank in that group."

S&P further said that under the existing legislation, banks in Sri Lanka are subject to on-site examinations by the banking sector regulator at least once every two years, which is not adequate.

"We believe the frequency of on-site supervision may not be sufficient for the regulator to quickly detect risk build-ups. Moreover, we see a potential conflict of interest in the central bank’s role. In addition to policy formulation and supervision of banks, the monetary board of the central bank also oversees Employees’ Provident Fund investments. The fund is a large investor in Sri Lankan banking stocks," S&P said.

Dr. De Silva said such reviews were damaging investor confidence.

"The government should not shoot the messenger but focus its energies in improving good governance, transparency and macroeconomic management," he said.
http://island.lk/index.php?page_cat=article-details&page=article-details&code_title=54884

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum