FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™

Encyclopedia of Latest news, reviews, discussions and analysis of stock market and investment opportunities in Sri Lanka

Click Link to get instant AI answers to all business queries.
Click Link to find latest Economic Outlook of Sri Lanka
Click Link to view latest Research and Analysis of the key Sectors and Industries of Sri Lanka
Worried about Paying Taxes? Click Link to find answers to all your Tax related matters
Do you have a legal issues? Find instant answers to all Sri Lanka Legal queries. Click Link
Latest images

Latest topics

» McDonald’s අපේ නෙමෙයි අපේ බෝස්ගේ – අබාන්ස් කියයි
by ChooBoy Today at 10:19 am

» AI Assistance for Stock Market Research and Analysis
by ChatGPT Today at 7:12 am

» Comparative Analysis of the Insurance Sector
by God Father Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:46 pm

» Sri Lanka: Why Pay Exorbitant Taxes?
by ChatGPT Tue Mar 26, 2024 10:52 pm

» LANKA CREDIT AND BUSINESS FINANCE PLC (LCBF.N0000)
by K.R Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:15 pm

» CENTRAL INDUSTRIES PLC (CIND.N0000)
by D.G.Dayaratne Tue Mar 26, 2024 9:11 am

» SIYAPATHA FINANACE PLC (SLFL.N0000)
by ChatGPT Tue Mar 26, 2024 7:58 am

» FINANCE AND LEASING SECTOR
by ChatGPT Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:45 am

» LOLC FINANCE PLC (LOFC.N0000)
by ChatGPT Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:36 am

» CIC HOLDINGS PLC (CIC.N0000)
by ChatGPT Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:18 am

» UNION ASSURANCE PLC (UAL.N0000)
by ChatGPT Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:15 am

» First Capital Holdings PLC: Current Financial performance and future outlook
by God Father Sun Mar 24, 2024 10:58 pm

» LankaBizz: Sri Lanka's First ever Artificially Intelligent (AI) Business and Research Assistant
by God Father Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:27 am

» HOTEL AND TRAVEL SECTOR
by ErangaDS Wed Mar 20, 2024 7:22 am

» CIC Holdings Good Times Ahead
by ashan silva Mon Mar 18, 2024 11:00 am

» EPF Fund keep eye on low P/E Shares
by K.R Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:45 am

» SINS - the Tailwind effects of a crisis hit Economy
by Hawk Eye Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:37 am

» Ceylon cold stores
by Hawk Eye Mon Mar 18, 2024 8:25 am

» Asha securities Provide buy signal for CIC
by ddrperera Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:10 am

» CSE ready for another Downtrend?
by D.G.Dayaratne Thu Mar 14, 2024 11:24 am

» LankaLAW Forum : Sri Lanka’s #1 Discussion Platform for Legal Questions and Answers
by blindhog Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:14 am

» Sri Lanka poised to benefit from demand surge for ‘non-China origin’ graphite
by samaritan Wed Mar 13, 2024 1:31 pm

» LOLC hotels
by Maharaja Tue Mar 12, 2024 2:34 pm

» AEL target price ?
by suku502 Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:26 am

» WAPO 200% UP
by LAMDA Sun Mar 10, 2024 10:33 pm

LISTED COMPANIES

Submit Post
ශ්‍රී ලංකා මූල්‍ය වංශකථාව - සිංහල
Submit Post


CONATCT US


Send your suggestions and comments

* - required fields

Read FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ Disclaimer



EXPERT CHRONICLE™

ECONOMIC CHRONICLE

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)



CHRONICLE™ YouTube

Disclaimer
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ Disclaimer

The information contained in this FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ have been submitted by third parties directly without any verification by us. The information available in this forum is not researched or purported to be complete description of the subject matter referred to herein. We do not under any circumstances whatsoever guarantee the accuracy and completeness information contained herein. FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ its blogs, forums, domains, subdomains and/or its affiliates and/or its web masters, administrators or moderators shall not in any way be responsible or liable for loss or damage which any person or party may sustain or incur by relying on the contents of this report and acting directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever. Trading or investing in stocks & commodities is a high risk activity. Any action you choose to take in the markets is totally your own responsibility, FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ blogs, forums, domains, subdomains and/or its affiliates and/or its web masters, administrators or moderators shall not be liable for any, direct or indirect, consequential or incidental damages or loss arising out of the use of this information. The information on this website is neither an offer to sell nor solicitation to buy any of the securities mentioned herein. The writers may or may not be trading in the securities mentioned.

Further the writers and users shall not induce or attempt to induce another person to trade in securities using this platform (a) by making or publishing any statement or by making any forecast that he knows to be misleading, false or deceptive; (b) by any dishonest concealment of material facts; (c) by the reckless making or publishing, dishonestly or otherwise of any statement or forecast that is misleading, false or deceptive; or (d) by recording or storing in, or by means of, any mechanical, electronic or other device, information that he knows to be false or misleading in a material particular. Any action writers and users take in respect of (a),(b),(c) and (d) above shall be their own responsibility, FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ its blogs, forums, domains, subdomains and/or its affiliates and/or its web masters, administrators or moderators shall not be liable for any, direct or indirect, consequential or incidental violation of securities laws of any country, damages or loss arising out of the use of this information.


AI Live Chat

You are not connected. Please login or register

CDIC, NDB <- I told you so

+8
The Alchemist
Jiggysaurus
Redbulls
Backstage
seek
Slstock
smallville
rainmaker
12 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:36 am

rainmaker


Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

See the latest submission, CDIC should come down significantly after the buyback. The sub will now lose its core cash-flow and source of profitability - it will be an overvalued 18B/= subsidary (worth 21B/= right now).

NDB has itself to blame, and I hope they bite the bullet and write off most of its value instead of taking "fair value of investments" as per IFRS. In the 2011 annual report NDB has used 2.7B as cost value and Market value 13.9B ---- Fortunately they have used cost value or otherwise NDB shareholders would have seen a massive impairment.

Anyway I would like to see NDB write off some. If it doesn't the Auditors should be held up for their accountability.

2CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:33 am

smallville

smallville
Associate Director - Equity Analytics
Associate Director - Equity Analytics

Oh.. I thot the thread is started by Rajitha - going by the name Wink

So is there a chance of NDB getting a bad rating (Fitch, etc..) if hold on?

3CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:36 am

Slstock

Slstock
Director - Equity Analytics
Director - Equity Analytics


Let me join you in your sentiment Small Very Happy

Rain if you are confused, there was a guy who used to dissaper from the forum for a long time and suddenly reappear when the time is right to say I told you so.


smallville wrote:Oh.. I thot the thread is started by Rajitha - going by the name Wink

4CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:26 am

rainmaker


Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

Yes I shouldn't have said "told you so" because I didn't tell you anything before!!! I honestly don't know who Rajitha is.

I was actually surprised that it wasn't picked up earlier. As a plus it was a good thing they didn't take market value as they have every right to do so. -> like CDB et al

Actually if they did disclose fair value they would have booked some good profits in the past. as equity gain is posted through P&L before going into the balance sheet. From the 2011 Annual report to now the Market cap of CDIC has improved by 11 B/= (from 13B to 24B).

Usually when disposing an asset the Audit Committee should disclose the impact on consolidated results. Hence NDB should disclose to its shareholders that an impairment in value of its subsidiary would occur.

It seems that there is an accounting problem because NDB can also not impair the cost value but then revert to market value. Not sure but I think they should have provided more guidance.... I'm sure another disclosure will arrive once the Auditors/ SEC get the wind of this

5CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:09 am

seek


Senior Manager - Equity Analytics
Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

@rainmaker,

Would you like to share your experience in CSE bit (only if you wish)? How long you are in the business, your academic background etc?..
You seem to be someone who is heading a top position in this industry.
By the way, I’ve send you are private message (if you have not seen yet), and highly appreciate if you can send a reply.



Last edited by seek on Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:28 am; edited 1 time in total

6CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:22 am

Backstage

Backstage
Moderator
Moderator

Been a while since we have seen a "I told you so" post Smile

7CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:48 am

Redbulls

Redbulls
Director - Equity Analytics
Director - Equity Analytics

Appreciate rainmaker's contribution, but still I'm confused.

8CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:10 pm

rainmaker


Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

Why confused? Look at the latest statements. Under assets you will see:

Investments in Associates & Subsidiaries 2,659,704 (in '000s)

Most of that relates to the following:
Capital Development and Investment Company PLC 2,330,855 (in '000s) - cost value as per the 2011 Annual Report

In the same annual report you will find two notes that are not correct.

24.2 The Directors' valuation of Investments in Subsidiary companies has been done on net assets basis except for investments in quoted
companies, which is at the market value as at the Balance Sheet date.

24.3 As explained in 24.2, Capital Development Company PLC has been valued at the market price as at the Balance Sheet date. The Company's
shares are traded and the market price is driven by the minority shareholders of only 0.4%.

--------

The above note has not been applied by NDB's accountants because the notes declare that the market value is 13 Billion but the balance sheet only shows the cost value.

Now since the following subsidiary has been affected negatively by disposing its core cash-flow + giving a costly buy back, this subsidiary's value has to be impaired.

If NDB is consistent, it will right off 2.33 Billion. This is the cost value before NDB IB and NDB Stock Brokers. Therefore 2.33 Billion will be written off the balance sheet and this will be passed on in the P&L as a "loss" to the company.

The loss will be offset against the "gain" from equity income from the investment subsidiary. Without this gain, the loss from the above would be taken into the "Statements for Changes in Equity".

So that's the picture that NDB has to disclose to the market (if it decides to be honest and impair the asset).

9CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:19 pm

Jiggysaurus

Jiggysaurus
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

rainmaker wrote:

If NDB is consistent, it will right off 2.33 Billion. This is the cost value before NDB IB and NDB Stock Brokers. Therefore 2.33 Billion will be written off the balance sheet and this will be passed on in the P&L as a "loss" to the company.


The only reason to write off the 2.33 billion is if CDIC trades at 0. As long as a few trades takes place at 500 there is no accounting need to fully write off.

10CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:23 pm

Slstock

Slstock
Director - Equity Analytics
Director - Equity Analytics

I am no accountant but is the declared gain pure capital gain ( which takes into account cost of purchase) or is it just the amount received by selling?

rainmaker wrote:Why confused? Look at the latest statements. Under assets you will see:

Investments in Associates & Subsidiaries 2,659,704 (in '000s)

Most of that relates to the following:
Capital Development and Investment Company PLC 2,330,855 (in '000s) - cost value as per the 2011 Annual Report

In the same annual report you will find two notes that are not correct.

24.2 The Directors' valuation of Investments in Subsidiary companies has been done on net assets basis except for investments in quoted
companies, which is at the market value as at the Balance Sheet date.

24.3 As explained in 24.2, Capital Development Company PLC has been valued at the market price as at the Balance Sheet date. The Company's
shares are traded and the market price is driven by the minority shareholders of only 0.4%.

--------

The above note has not been applied by NDB's accountants because the notes declare that the market value is 13 Billion but the balance sheet only shows the cost value.

Now since the following subsidiary has been affected negatively by disposing its core cash-flow + giving a costly buy back, this subsidiary's value has to be impaired.

If NDB is consistent, it will right off 2.33 Billion. This is the cost value before NDB IB and NDB Stock Brokers. Therefore 2.33 Billion will be written off the balance sheet and this will be passed on in the P&L as a "loss" to the company.

The loss will be offset against the "gain" from equity income from the investment subsidiary. Without this gain, the loss from the above would be taken into the "Statements for Changes in Equity".

So that's the picture that NDB has to disclose to the market (if it decides to be honest and impair the asset).

11CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:59 pm

rainmaker


Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

Jiggysaurus wrote:
rainmaker wrote:

If NDB is consistent, it will right off 2.33 Billion. This is the cost value before NDB IB and NDB Stock Brokers. Therefore 2.33 Billion will be written off the balance sheet and this will be passed on in the P&L as a "loss" to the company.


The only reason to write off the 2.33 billion is if CDIC trades at 0. As long as a few trades takes place at 500 there is no accounting need to fully write off.


That's not correct. Every quarter the value of that subsdiary is assessed for consolidation. If the directors/auditors believe that the subsidiary is impaired, then they have to impair it. If they don't they are personally liable for submitting misrepresenting accounts. The auditors have to also endorse the accounts ---- Hence this will change.

The only reason why NDB has not taken market value is because the "bank" will have fluctuating Tier I and Tier II ratios.

As per Basel II, "the bank must deduct in full any capital investments that exceed the materiality threshold" - hence the ratios get altered.

If NDB Group owned an investment company below the materiality threshold then that investment carries a risk weight of 100% in full. <---- Hence the need for a separate incorporation. This is why banks don't like to invest in the sharemarket. If you do, the risk capital is quite high.

12CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:28 pm

The Alchemist


Senior Manager - Equity Analytics
Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

rainmaker wrote:See the latest submission, CDIC should come down significantly after the buyback. The sub will now lose its core cash-flow and source of profitability - it will be an overvalued 18B/= subsidary (worth 21B/= right now).

NDB has itself to blame, and I hope they bite the bullet and write off most of its value instead of taking "fair value of investments" as per IFRS. In the 2011 annual report NDB has used 2.7B as cost value and Market value 13.9B ---- Fortunately they have used cost value or otherwise NDB shareholders would have seen a massive impairment.

Anyway I would like to see NDB write off some. If it doesn't the Auditors should be held up for their accountability.


@ Rainmaker,
Good Observation. Pardon me, but I am trying to figure out the actual point in this rather lengthy discussion. So it seems that NDB has overvalued its investment in CDIC by taking the market price of its holding which is higher than the cost /asset value by Rs 2.3 Billion, despite only 0.4 % of CDIC traded in the market. This is your assertion right ? Correct me if i'm wrong. Is'nt this the Mark to Market Principle ? Is'nt this what the new SLFRS requires us to do ? Is'nt it true that most companies trade above their cost / asset values ? If NDB accounted for its investment in CDIC at cost and the repurchase happened at a higher price, the opposite of what your saying would have to happen. I did not follow this entire NDB / CDIC / Eagle Insurance sale and repurchase transaction ( and i am too lazy to revisit and research this !). All i know is that NDB is sitting on a pile of cash as a result of this. So even though they may have to (according to you) write off approx approx Rs 15/- per share and this a non cash item (and will not effect their Cash Flow in any way), would'nt the net benefit it receives overall due to this transaction, offset this ? In the final analysis, Is NDB (Rs 150) a Buy, Sell or Hold in your opinion ?

13CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:29 pm

Hanoifortune

Hanoifortune
Senior Manager - Equity Analytics
Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

Rain, Pls clarify how can we as an investor hold auditors responsible ?Pls see below from any anual report.

Management’s responsibility
Management is responsible for the preparation and presentation of the Statement in accordance with the “Guidance for Directors of
Banks on the Directors’ Statement on Internal Control” issued in compliance with section 3(Cool(ii)(b) of the Banking Act Direction No. 11 of
2007, by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka.
Our responsibilities and compliance with SLSAE 3050
Our responsibility is to issue a report to the board on the Statement based on the work performed. We conducted our engagement in
accordance with Sri Lanka Standard on Assurance Engagements SLSAE 3050 - Assurance Report for Banks on Directors’ Statement on
Internal Control issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Sri Lanka.

14CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:40 pm

Jiggysaurus

Jiggysaurus
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

The Alchemist wrote:
rainmaker wrote:See the latest submission, CDIC should come down significantly after the buyback. The sub will now lose its core cash-flow and source of profitability - it will be an overvalued 18B/= subsidary (worth 21B/= right now).

NDB has itself to blame, and I hope they bite the bullet and write off most of its value instead of taking "fair value of investments" as per IFRS. In the 2011 annual report NDB has used 2.7B as cost value and Market value 13.9B ---- Fortunately they have used cost value or otherwise NDB shareholders would have seen a massive impairment.

Anyway I would like to see NDB write off some. If it doesn't the Auditors should be held up for their accountability.


@ Rainmaker,
So it seems that NDB has overvalued its investment in CDIC by taking the market price of its holding which is higher than the cost /asset value by Rs 2.3 Billion, despite only 0.4 % of CDIC traded in the market. This is your assertion right ? Correct me if i'm wrong. Is'nt this the Mark to Market Principle ? Is'nt this what the new SLFRS requires us to do ? Is'nt it true that most companies trade above their cost / asset values ? If NDB accounted for its investment in CDIC at cost and the repurchase happened at a higher price, the opposite of what your saying would have to happen.


That's the confusion, rainman is saying that they have valued at 2.3 billion (which is cost) and he wants a further impairment at the company and group levels.
If the share is trading at 550 the directors can easily say that there is no need for impairment, since the market cap is 21 billion and they are carrying on the books for 2.3 billion.

15CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:41 pm

Slstock

Slstock
Director - Equity Analytics
Director - Equity Analytics

I have forgoten my accounting so someone please explain .

Say I have in my account shares purchased at a cost of Rs 100 .

Then I sell them for Rs 300.

So I include my capital gain of Rs 200 a share in my Income statement.

Where would the other Rs100 which I have received ( which will offset my cost) go in my account?



[quote="slstock"]I am no accountant but is the declared gain pure capital gain ( which takes into account cost of purchase) or is it just the amount received by selling?

16CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:57 pm

rainmaker


Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

Yes @Jiggysaurus is correct. Actually the impairment should occur because I believe they will not take market value for Basel II reasons.

This is not a Buy/Sell/Hold discussion but more of a discussion of the sort of mess that NDB is now entangled in. After the buyback, I don't believe CDIC's shares will be worth much. Hence current shareholders have to decide whether to hold and take the buy back or sell now.

On the other hand I think NDB has not handled this correctly. They should have changed the articles of association to ensure the major shareholder can force a takeover if the major shareholder holds more than 90%.

If NDB buys out the other shareholders, the cost will not be expensive. CDIC has 43,855,007 in issue of which 150,245 is not theirs. If NDB buys them out at 560/= the cost will be only 84 million.

Even at 1000/= each, it would have cost them only 150 million.


-------------------------
@slstock, This is not about a capital gain but about impairing an asset. Say if a bank writes off a billlion rupees of loans (ie bank assets), how would it get processed. For example when you look at banking and finance stocks, you should look at the NPL ratio. You may say you have an asset, but is it really an asset?

17CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:16 pm

Jiggysaurus

Jiggysaurus
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

rainmaker wrote:

This is not a Buy/Sell/Hold discussion but more of a discussion of the sort of mess that NDB is now entangled in. After the buyback, I don't believe CDIC's shares will be worth much. Hence current shareholders have to decide whether to hold and take the buy back or sell now.



Hang on, i just looked at CDIC's Dec statements and they have NAV/book value of 11 billion (mainly made up of cash). so assume they have to pay out 5 billion for the buyback (not bothered to check the exact details) that still leaves NAV/book value of around 5 billion. NDB is carrying this at 2.3 billion. So you really can't say that CDIC's is not work much ( it's definitely not worth 500 but it's worth more than NDB's carrying value)

18CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:11 pm

The Alchemist


Senior Manager - Equity Analytics
Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

[quote="slstock"]I have forgoten my accounting so someone please explain .

Say I have in my account shares purchased at a cost of Rs 100 .

Then I sell them for Rs 300.

So I include my capital gain of Rs 200 a share in my Income statement.

Where would the other Rs100 which I have received ( which will offset my cost) go in my account?


slstock wrote:I am no accountant but is the declared gain pure capital gain ( which takes into account cost of purchase) or is it just the amount received by selling?

@slstock - not an accountant either but here goes -

Revenue - Rs 300
Carrying amount of Investment disposed - Rs 100
Profit - Rs 200

The Rs 200 Profit which is shown in the Income Statement then goes to Retained Earnings (Revenue Reserve) in the Equity Account on Balance Sheet.

It gets more complicated if you account with many other shares you may have in your portfolio as you have to nett unrealized gains / losses, before arriving at a profit number. also under the new accounting standard, it depends on how you classify your initial investment i.e. long term investment or available for sale. If it is under available for sale, then you are required to impair cost (mark to market) in period where it went below Rs 100 cost.
For eg - before you sold your Rs 100 Share at Rs 300, say in a period the market price was Rs 80, then you would account for it in your personal income statement as
Revenue - Rs 0
Impairment of available for sale financial assets - Rs 20
Loss - Rs 20

Then subsequently when you sell it for Rs 300 and have to account for it, you would also have to reverse the initial impairment of Rs 20.

Not 100 % sure about all this ! Hope others will clarrify.



Last edited by The Alchemist on Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:02 pm; edited 1 time in total

19CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:42 pm

worthiness


Senior Vice President - Equity Analytics
Senior Vice President - Equity Analytics

Your book keeper simply helps you to maintain the above sale transaction.

Your investment account Rs.100/= becomes zero since you sold the shares.
Your bank balance is increased by the amount less any sale commission charged. (i.e. 300 less sale commission charged-let us assume Rs.295/
Sales commission of Rs.5/= is charged as an expense against the income.
Profit of Rs.200/- shows in your income statement.


20CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:24 pm

glad


Senior Manager - Equity Analytics
Senior Manager - Equity Analytics

worthiness wrote:Your book keeper simply helps you to maintain the above sale transaction.

Your investment account Rs.100/= becomes zero since you sold the shares.
Your bank balance is increased by the amount less any sale commission charged. (i.e. 300 less sale commission charged-let us assume Rs.295/
Sales commission of Rs.5/= is charged as an expense against the income.
Profit of Rs.200/- shows in your income statement.


I am no accountant but think the book-keeping entries will be:
Dr- Bank/cash -------295.00- to record the cash/chq in bank
Cr- Investment-------100.00 - to wipe out the investment that is sold
cr- Profit/loss a/c-----195.00-to record the profit


But it is not so simple as rainmaker explains in the case of NDB Capital Hldgs

21CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:27 am

Slstock

Slstock
Director - Equity Analytics
Director - Equity Analytics

Thanks for all the responses. We are learning from each other.

22CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Empty Re: CDIC, NDB <- I told you so Thu Mar 27, 2014 1:07 am

Jeremy

Jeremy
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics
Assistant Vice President - Equity Analytics

CDIC... Rare stamp

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum