Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.
Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE

www.srilankachronicle.com
Encyclopedia of Latest news, reviews, discussions and analysis of stock market and investment opportunities in Sri Lanka
Views & Reviews, Analysis, Evaluations, Discussions, Gossip and Hot Tips relating to Sri Lankan companies listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange (CSE)
Contribute
Latest news and articles published in Newspapers, Websites, Blogs and other online news sites relating to business and investments in Sri Lanka
Contribute
This is a section that provide news, views, analysis, predications relating to Political and Socio-Economic factors and how such activities affect the Stock Market and other economic activity of the Country.
Contribute
This is an exclusive section for Expert Articles which will help member to share knowledge through comments and responses of the members. All members are allowed to reply and make comments to these articles.
Youtube Videos and other visual presentations relating Stock market and other investment advise submitted by members or other contributors.
Contribute
AITKEN SPENCE HOTEL HOLDINGS PLC
ANILANA HOTELS AND PROPERTIES PLC
B
BLUE DIAMONDS JEWELLERY WORLDWIDE PLC
C
CARGO BOAT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PLC
CEYLON GRAIN ELEVATORS PLC Hot
COLOMBO FORT LAND & BUILDING PLC
COMMERCIAL CREDIT AND FINANCE PLC
D
DIALOG AXIATA PLC
DISTILLERIES COMPANY OF SRI LANKA PLC
E
F
G
H
HAYLEYS FABRIC PLC
HVA FOODS PLC
J
JANASHAKTHI INSURANCE COMPANY PLC
JOHN KEELLS HOLDINGS PLC Hot
JOHN KEELLS HOTELS PLC
L
LANKEM CEYLON PLC
LAUGFS GAS PLC
LUCKY LANKA MILK PROCESSING COMPANY PLC
M
N
NATION LANKA FINANCE PLC
NESTLE LANKA PLC
O
P
PEOPLE'S LEASING & FINANCE PLC
PIRAMAL GLASS CEYLON PLC
R
RICHARD PIERIS AND COMPANY PLC
RICHARD PIERIS EXPORTS PLC Hot
ROYAL CERAMICS PLC
S
SOFTLOGIC LIFE INSURANCE PLC
SRI LANKA TELECOM PLC
T
TESS AGRO PLC
TOKYO CEMENT COMPANY (LANKA) PLC Hot
U
V
VALLIBEL ONE PLC Hot
W
price prediction of tjl 17@gamaya wrote:Usually in CSE when good new is shared freely its time for distribution.
Otherwise only the price would indicate good news.
@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
@ccsentha - your reply tells me that you have not grasped the basic, montessori level concept@ccsentha wrote:Mate KURU is not owned by TJL, TJL has nothing to do with KURU.
U might find some directors common in both companies, that is because both of them are related companies to brandix and the common directors are representatives of brandix.
TJL is a joint venture between brandix and a Hong Kong knit manufacturing company@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
Mate it's you who cannot understand the basics. Kuru and tjl are not under same management.@The Alchemist wrote:@ccsentha - your reply tells me that you have not grasped the basic, montessori level concept@ccsentha wrote:Mate KURU is not owned by TJL, TJL has nothing to do with KURU.
U might find some directors common in both companies, that is because both of them are related companies to brandix and the common directors are representatives of brandix.
TJL is a joint venture between brandix and a Hong Kong knit manufacturing company@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
to my post. no wonder i have his feeling that i may have spent far too much time clarrifying your concerns at expo ! if you cannot grasp this simple TJL / KURU point that i am trying to make, i am not surprised anymore at your reaction to the EXPO disclosure issue.
I am confused about your view that TJL owners themself should inform shareholders of KURU about its bad news, because their annual reports do not show any connection of ownership or Director Boards.@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
I would not like to mention anything further on this matter. the reason being that it would entail me mentioning names, roles, connections, beneficial owners etc which may be not appropriate in a public forum. either people understand the link or do not. either way, not very important to me. i was just trying to point out a subtle double standard.@K.Haputantri wrote:I am confused about your view that TJL owners themself should inform shareholders of KURU about its bad news, because their annual reports do not show any connection of ownership or Director Boards.@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
Aha, you seem to have access to lots of inside info in so called listed companies. So, what we see in annual reports do not give the actual ownership and there are "proxy" Directors who covertly run the show on behalf of actual owners. If that is what you meant I have no reason to disagree.@The Alchemist wrote:I would not like to mention anything further on this matter. the reason being that it would entail me mentioning names, roles, connections, beneficial owners etc which may be not appropriate in a public forum. either people understand the link or do not. either way, not very important to me. i was just trying to point out a subtle double standard.@K.Haputantri wrote:I am confused about your view that TJL owners themself should inform shareholders of KURU about its bad news, because their annual reports do not show any connection of ownership or Director Boards.@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
No that is not what i meant. i do not have any access to inside information. all i know is in the public domain. seek and you shall also find.@K.Haputantri wrote:Aha, you seem to have access to lots of inside info in so called listed companies. So, what we see in annual reports do not give the actual ownership and there are "proxy" Directors who covertly run the show on behalf of actual owners. If that is what you meant I have no reason to disagree.@The Alchemist wrote:I would not like to mention anything further on this matter. the reason being that it would entail me mentioning names, roles, connections, beneficial owners etc which may be not appropriate in a public forum. either people understand the link or do not. either way, not very important to me. i was just trying to point out a subtle double standard.@K.Haputantri wrote:I am confused about your view that TJL owners themself should inform shareholders of KURU about its bad news, because their annual reports do not show any connection of ownership or Director Boards.@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
TJL and KURU directly or indirectly control by Ashroff Omar.@The Alchemist wrote:No that is not what i meant. i do not have any access to inside information. all i know is in the public domain. seek and you shall also find.@K.Haputantri wrote:Aha, you seem to have access to lots of inside info in so called listed companies. So, what we see in annual reports do not give the actual ownership and there are "proxy" Directors who covertly run the show on behalf of actual owners. If that is what you meant I have no reason to disagree.@The Alchemist wrote:I would not like to mention anything further on this matter. the reason being that it would entail me mentioning names, roles, connections, beneficial owners etc which may be not appropriate in a public forum. either people understand the link or do not. either way, not very important to me. i was just trying to point out a subtle double standard.@K.Haputantri wrote:I am confused about your view that TJL owners themself should inform shareholders of KURU about its bad news, because their annual reports do not show any connection of ownership or Director Boards.@The Alchemist wrote:@Rapaport wrote:Other companies in CSE should follow TJL path and inform shareholders in the same way!
Cheers!
not only other companies, the TJL owners themselves must also inform shareholders about the not so positive developments in their company KURU, same as they are sharing news of positive development in their company TJL.
it is good if companies are transparent with both good & bad news / developments in a timely manner (via investor forums etc).
what generally happens is that good news / developments are highlighted early (eg. TJL) & bad news / developments follow later in a footnote (eg. KURU), both by pretty much, the same management / owners.
Hmm.....
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum