All i know this was the whole article.
If you have the full article please provide it via PM i will have look at it and come back to you.
SharK
Encyclopedia of Latest news, reviews, discussions and analysis of stock market and investment opportunities in Sri Lanka
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
SHARK wrote:
Yes true i left and discontinued my thread for some time until i took stock of clear picture as to what was happening then.
Kind regards
SHARK
SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,
On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.
Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.
As Admins & Mods we have acted with self restraint allowing both parties to opine their views.
What happened thereafter was it became a personal attack on us and wild accusations without substantial proof of dual identity of GMNet & Sstar, to cover the original issue deceitfully.
In this connection to safeguard the SLEF, Me and Sstar have disclosed publicly exonerating our Forum & distancing with the statement.
Lastly no one is denying the services of past Admins & Mods. This should not be misunderstood. As SLEF recognises the past efforts of these leaders.
Hapu, i have come to know how this whole issue began and i am seeing the signs clearly. i do not want to discuss it here and best leave it closed for the sake of good old times.
Kumar wrote:Please find the thread detail and the part cut and pasted could be find on page 6.
*****************************************************************
Dear Kumar,
Please PM me to have a look at it.
SHARK
Dear HapuMeman wrote:The part of your response is a staightforward lie. Where does it say anyone wanted to talk about identity of gmnet or sstar? I made a comment somewhere else where jonta mentioned about banning him. Can you please show us where on that forum anyone has commented about this? You have given a childish answer to locking the thread. You did it to save your a** as well as other admins from opposing comments .
SHARK wrote:Kumar wrote:Please find the thread detail and the part cut and pasted could be find on page 6.
*****************************************************************
Dear Kumar,
Please PM me to have a look at it.
SHARK
Dear Kumar,
Isnt it good practice what you preach preach what you practice ...... few moments ago.
Please PM me the full article i will take care of it.
Thanks
SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,
On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.
Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.
As Admins & Mods we have acted with self restraint allowing both parties to opine their views.
What happened thereafter was it became a personal attack on us and wild accusations without substantial proof of dual identity of GMNet & Sstar, to cover the original issue deceitfully.
In this connection to safeguard the SLEF, Me and Sstar have disclosed publicly exonerating our Forum & distancing with the statement.
Lastly no one is denying the services of past Admins & Mods. This should not be misunderstood. As SLEF recognises the past efforts of these leaders.
Hapu, i have come to know how this whole issue began and i am seeing the signs clearly. i do not want to discuss it here and best leave it closed for the sake of good old times.
Dear Sash,sashimaal wrote:May i ask who gave GMNet or any Admin here the Police or Judicial powers on below highlighted??
If someone needs clarification, they should ask it there rather than slinging mud from somewhere else!
GMNet or SStar should understand these acts will not get them to SLStock's level but show what low level people they are.SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,
On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.
Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.
As Admins & Mods we have acted with self restraint allowing both parties to opine their views.
What happened thereafter was it became a personal attack on us and wild accusations without substantial proof of dual identity of GMNet & Sstar, to cover the original issue deceitfully.
In this connection to safeguard the SLEF, Me and Sstar have disclosed publicly exonerating our Forum & distancing with the statement.
Lastly no one is denying the services of past Admins & Mods. This should not be misunderstood. As SLEF recognises the past efforts of these leaders.
Hapu, i have come to know how this whole issue began and i am seeing the signs clearly. i do not want to discuss it here and best leave it closed for the sake of good old times.
SHARK wrote:Dear Sash,sashimaal wrote:May i ask who gave GMNet or any Admin here the Police or Judicial powers on below highlighted??
If someone needs clarification, they should ask it there rather than slinging mud from somewhere else!
GMNet or SStar should understand these acts will not get them to SLStock's level but show what low level people they are.SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,
On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.
Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.
As Admins & Mods we have acted with self restraint allowing both parties to opine their views.
What happened thereafter was it became a personal attack on us and wild accusations without substantial proof of dual identity of GMNet & Sstar, to cover the original issue deceitfully.
In this connection to safeguard the SLEF, Me and Sstar have disclosed publicly exonerating our Forum & distancing with the statement.
Lastly no one is denying the services of past Admins & Mods. This should not be misunderstood. As SLEF recognises the past efforts of these leaders.
Hapu, i have come to know how this whole issue began and i am seeing the signs clearly. i do not want to discuss it here and best leave it closed for the sake of good old times.
Its not the copy paste issue i consider serious, the contents of the post is disturbing.It may not be as serious as one of you see it, thats why i stated in my posts he could provide a clarification or wait without giving any explanation as his right.I am sure he is aware of what was going on here at least he could have immediately put an explanation on the said forum and could have forwarded to me by any one and definitely i would have carried it on our forum on behalf of him.since nothing was forthcoming i locked the thread.now due to Hapu i opened it despite so many other requests.
OMG what a waste of time this has been going around the merry go round ...... just a small statement to this effect would have easily been nip in the bud at that time isnt it kumar by the concern individual. anyways i will look into this and advise.Kumar wrote:Still you seems to be stubborn, (which respectful trader's trait is contradicting) there is no clarification needed from his part which The Alchemist and Hapu clearly pointed to you.SHARK wrote:Dear Sash,sashimaal wrote:May i ask who gave GMNet or any Admin here the Police or Judicial powers on below highlighted??
If someone needs clarification, they should ask it there rather than slinging mud from somewhere else!
GMNet or SStar should understand these acts will not get them to SLStock's level but show what low level people they are.SHARK wrote:Dear Hapu,
On behalf of the forum we allowed the thread to be kept opened, and allowed ample time for concern person to put his comments, it was not a sudden decision to keep it locked. Since responses from the individual not forthcoming i took the decision to close as i felt its not ethical to have it open and it may be detrimental for the same person.as he is not willing to give a clariciation.
Nobody is accusing anyone, but contents are some what skewed in my opinion and open for ambiguity.
As Admins & Mods we have acted with self restraint allowing both parties to opine their views.
What happened thereafter was it became a personal attack on us and wild accusations without substantial proof of dual identity of GMNet & Sstar, to cover the original issue deceitfully.
In this connection to safeguard the SLEF, Me and Sstar have disclosed publicly exonerating our Forum & distancing with the statement.
Lastly no one is denying the services of past Admins & Mods. This should not be misunderstood. As SLEF recognises the past efforts of these leaders.
Hapu, i have come to know how this whole issue began and i am seeing the signs clearly. i do not want to discuss it here and best leave it closed for the sake of good old times.
Its not the copy paste issue i consider serious, the contents of the post is disturbing.It may not be as serious as one of you see it, thats why i stated in my posts he could provide a clarification or wait without giving any explanation as his right.I am sure he is aware of what was going on here at least he could have immediately put an explanation on the said forum and could have forwarded to me by any one and definitely i would have carried it on our forum on behalf of him.since nothing was forthcoming i locked the thread.now due to Hapu i opened it despite so many other requests.
SHARK wrote:
OMG what a waste of time this has been going around the merry go round ...... just a small statement to this effect would have easily been nip in the bud at that time isnt it kumar by the concern individual. anyways i will look into this and advise.
Shark
jonta999 wrote:Poor fella's reputation gone to dogs...And Gment's money is speaking here
Please dont confuse when you say i am defending any one in this Forum. I will defend what is right and not what is wrong.sashimaal wrote:I remember someone called TAH telling me in the other forum he will not put ASI charts unless SLStock tells him... Yeah, D.Silva syndrome
Shark - selecting which forum you should be in your choice. But don't fall to these low levels where you defend GMNet, etc.
Where are they now? You are defending them onbehalf of SLEF !
jonta999 wrote:See the power of GMnet money. If he utters a word that is negative to GMnet he'll be discarded by the Gmnet mistress
The Alchemist wrote:@SHARK - I am simply pointing out to you, bringing to your notice, that what was posted by GMNet was a paragraph of an article posted by slstock somewhere in cyberspace. GMNet purposely, and with mischievous intent, quoted para out of context here in this forum, for which you had sought clarrification from slstock and now from some other members. We are not your servants or minions to provide you information. The onus is on you, as a co-administator of this forum, to get to the bottom of this. you can do so by
1. calling for an explanation from GMNet as to the source of this post.
2. Verify yourself as you have the neccessary resources in hand.
either way, it is crystal clear to me that GMNet has acted with malicious intent to cause harm to slstock reputation and you are complicit in not taking any action such as banning GMNet. instead you are stalling and marking time using stupid excuses such as asking for complete post etc from others.
Sadly, you are showing your colours and i am seeing yellow......
This will cause immeasurable damage to your reputation as a technical analyst as who would want to believe / trust someone with arcane technical analytical market calls, when their integrity as a human being, is in question.
So I urge you to take prompt action of investigating matter yourself and take appropriate action.
For me, nothing short of banning GMNet for this injustice will suffice.
I hope and trust at least now you will do the correct thing.
Last edited by Sstar on Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:27 pm; edited 1 time in total
kas wrote:The way the new GMnet treated all the senior members especially SLS is it right Mr. Shark????
Top Trader wrote:Dear All
These follows try to increase the traffic, by low grade activities like this, don't waste ur time
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ » CORPORATE CHRONICLE™ » My views on the locked post titled "Note to members from a former admin.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum