LOLC HOLDINGS PLC (LOLC.N0000)

SAGA wrote:it seems some one doesnt want to see it increase and trying to buy huge amounts at low.already more than 2 Mn shares traded.

abey wrote:MAYbe 750 end of september

Bakkabwoi wrote:

SAGA wrote:it seems some one doesnt want to see it increase and trying to buy huge amounts at low.already more than 2 Mn shares traded.

correct... collect it as it comes low.. this has 500+ stable future... do not sell short!~

abey wrote:MAYbe 750 end of september

kanishkaecomm wrote:

Balance Sheet Comparison: EXPO vs LOLC

*LOLC is 8.8 higher than EXPO.

kanishkaecomm wrote:

Balance Sheet Comparison: EXPO vs LOLC

*LOLC is 8.8 higher than EXPO.

ONTHEMONEY wrote:

kanishkaecomm wrote:

Balance Sheet Comparison: EXPO vs LOLC

*LOLC is 8.8 higher than EXPO.

Hi all,

This is NOT COMPARABLE. 

EXPO is a ASSET LIGHT COMPANY in LOGISTICS and LOLC is a HEAVY ASSET COMPANY financial services.

One cannot compare AMAZON with BANK of AMERICA in B/S. Light asset companies are agile and fast which is the modern growth business concept. Heavy Asset companies are good but takes more time to turn as the business is like a big ship

Investors should consider the share PRICE which are supported with HISTORICAL EARNINGS or ACCEPTABLE FORWARD EARNINGS which justify the the PURCHASE. 

Even if you buy right now, how can I safeguard my investments? That’s the question one should answer before buying!

No Technical expert will be there for SOS. Only fundamentals will ensure your investments 

Good Luck

Having physical stuff just isn’t as great as it used to be.in the digital age, the physical assets that the big companies have acquired are becoming more and more burdensome. Inventory depreciates and must be moved around. When geographic needs change, land is difficult to acquire or offload. And equipment must be maintained in a world that is becoming virtual and augmented by technology (VR and AR). In some cases, these assets are preventing companies from adapting, and weighing them down. It’s the corporate equivalent of having a closet full of old VHS tapes and CD cases,
The traditional asset-heavy corporations that used to be at the top of everybody’s most-admired lists are starting to look old-fashioned, slow-moving, and inflexible — particularly to investors. (https://hbr.org/2016/09/investors-today-prefer-companies-with-fewer-physical-assets)

Dilip wrote:

ONTHEMONEY wrote:

kanishkaecomm wrote:

Balance Sheet Comparison: EXPO vs LOLC

*LOLC is 8.8 higher than EXPO.

Hi all,

This is NOT COMPARABLE. 

EXPO is a ASSET LIGHT COMPANY in LOGISTICS and LOLC is a HEAVY ASSET COMPANY financial services.

One cannot compare AMAZON with BANK of AMERICA in B/S. Light asset companies are agile and fast which is the modern growth business concept. Heavy Asset companies are good but takes more time to turn as the business is like a big ship

Investors should consider the share PRICE which are supported with HISTORICAL EARNINGS or ACCEPTABLE FORWARD EARNINGS which justify the the PURCHASE. 

Even if you buy right now, how can I safeguard my investments? That’s the question one should answer before buying!

No Technical expert will be there for SOS. Only fundamentals will ensure your investments 

Good Luck

Having physical stuff just isn’t as great as it used to be.in the digital age, the physical assets that the big companies have acquired are becoming more and more burdensome. Inventory depreciates and must be moved around. When geographic needs change, land is difficult to acquire or offload. And equipment must be maintained in a world that is becoming virtual and augmented by technology (VR and AR). In some cases, these assets are preventing companies from adapting, and weighing them down. It’s the corporate equivalent of having a closet full of old VHS tapes and CD cases,
The traditional asset-heavy corporations that used to be at the top of everybody’s most-admired lists are starting to look old-fashioned, slow-moving, and inflexible — particularly to investors. (https://hbr.org/2016/09/investors-today-prefer-companies-with-fewer-physical-assets)

Mithooshan wrote:

Hope123 wrote:

Mithooshan wrote:

What about LOFC?

Mithooshan

Hope123 wrote:

Mithooshan wrote:

What about LOFC?

@Hope123, market sentiment is shifting towards the Lolc group from last Friday. You would know if you noticed the behavior.

Lofc is part of the group, yeah.

Trade wise though.