FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com


Join the forum, it's quick and easy

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Dear Reader,

Registration with the Sri Lanka FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️ would enable you to enjoy an array of other services such as Member Rankings, User Groups, Own Posts & Profile, Exclusive Research, Live Chat Box etc..

All information contained in this forum is subject to Disclaimer Notice published.


Thank You
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™️
www.srilankachronicle.com
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™

Encyclopedia of Latest news, reviews, discussions and analysis of stock market and investment opportunities in Sri Lanka

Latest topics

» PRIME LANDS RESIDENCIES PLC (PLR.N0000)
by DeepFreakingValue Yesterday at 9:48 pm

» Who actually own BROWNS INVESTMENTS (BIL)?
by DeepFreakingValue Yesterday at 4:18 pm

» AAIC රු 12 බැගින් අත්පත් කරගත් කොටස් 51% ඇති SCAP වෙත විශාල මූල්‍ය ලාභයක් හිමිවෙන බවට කටකතා ?
by sanjayapeiris351 Yesterday at 10:13 am

» EXPO සහ LOLC කොටස් මිල වැටුනත් කොළඹ කොටස් මාර්කට් එක ශක්තිමත් වෙයි ඉදිරියේ දී ?
by sanjayapeiris351 Yesterday at 10:10 am

» Don't Catch Falling Knives!!!
by Rational Investor Yesterday at 9:28 am

» Flu, Feed, And Fuel Have Made Eggs Really Expensive
by target1 Yesterday at 8:03 am

» Why Investors are worried about LOLC Group?
by Beyondsenses Yesterday at 7:54 am

» LOLC FINANCE PLC (LOFC.N0000)
by Beyondsenses Yesterday at 7:53 am

» EXPOLANKA HOLDINGS PLC (EXPO.N0000)
by God Father Fri Jan 27, 2023 11:07 pm

» Where is Harry J's looted wealth?
by rajini Fri Jan 27, 2023 6:28 pm

» Stock Market Prediction for 2023 for Zodiac Signs
by D.G.Dayaratne Fri Jan 27, 2023 8:27 am

» EXTERMINATORS PLC (EXT.N0000)
by ErangaDS Thu Jan 26, 2023 6:59 pm

» HAYLEYS GROUP: Out of the woods!
by DeepFreakingValue Thu Jan 26, 2023 5:45 pm

» -සමහර කුප්‍රකට සමාගම් අතිශ්‍යෝක්තියෙන් රචනා ලිවීම් මුදල් ගෙවා කරන පළකිරීම් පටන් ගෙන ඇති බව මා සිතමි
by sanjayapeiris351 Wed Jan 25, 2023 11:40 pm

» MELSTACORP PLC (MELS.N0000)
by God Father Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:49 pm

» Dividend shy LOLC group lose focus on Sri Lankan business
by ChooBoy Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:06 pm

» චීනය ලන්කාවට ණය ප්රතිව්යුහගත කිරීමට එකග වී ඇති බව ඇත්තක්
by D.G.Dayaratne Wed Jan 25, 2023 2:25 pm

» PLR (Prime Lands) Next Value counter.. Fair Value Rs 20
by sakuni Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:23 am

» Statement by academics on dealing with Sri Lankan debt, January 2023
by CHRONICLE™ Tue Jan 24, 2023 6:19 pm

» Nestle India to be delist..Next Nestle Sri Lanka ???
by ashan silva Tue Jan 24, 2023 10:25 am

LISTED COMPANIES

Submit Post
ADVERTS

Poll

EXCHANGE RATE PREDICTION: 2022

Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_lcap16%Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_rcap 16% [ 43 ]
Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_lcap21%Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_rcap 21% [ 58 ]
Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_lcap30%Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_rcap 30% [ 83 ]
Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_lcap34%Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved? Vote_rcap 34% [ 93 ]

Total Votes : 277

ශ්‍රී ලංකා මූල්‍ය වංශකථාව - සිංහල
Submit Post


CONATCT US


Send your suggestions and comments

* - required fields

Read FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ Disclaimer



EXPERT CHRONICLE™

MARKET CHAT


ECONOMIC CHRONICLE

GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT (GDP)


CHRONICLE™ YouTube

LATEST TWEETS

You are not connected. Please login or register

FINANCIAL CHRONICLE™ » CORPORATE CHRONICLE™ » Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved?

Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved?

Reply to topic

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

God Father


Manager - Equity Analytics
Manager - Equity Analytics


Not going to IMF then & going to IMF now : Will Sri Lanka’s Problems be solved?
Posted on May 14th, 2022


State of Sri Lanka’s Economy – Research Team


Since early 2020, the Gotabaya Rajapaksa government appeared to implement a plan with several components for the external sector. These components included securing of multi-lateral and bi-lateral loans, monetization of selected assets, obtaining Central Bank SWAPs, promoting Hambantota Industrial & Pharmaceutical Zones, Colombo Port City and other FDIs, and increasing non-debt inflows, remittances and exports. That plan did not contemplate an IMF programme. That official government stance was well known and in place until the President announced that he was seeking an IMF programme on 15th March 2022.

It will also be noted that those who were constantly urging the Government to seek an IMF programme, were claiming that Sri Lanka would then be able to access funding of about USD 3,000 million via an IMF programme and other borrowings. 
In that background, it would be helpful to assess what was achieved by the Sri Lankan authorities in the last year through the alternative strategies, without an IMF programme. 

The analysis of publicly available data shows that the Government secured forex cash loans of almost USD 1,300 million from the China Development Bank, while the CBSL obtained a SWAP of USD 1,550 million from the Peoples Bank of China.
 
The CBSL also secured bridging finance” of over USD 1,500 million from India through the postponement of the Asian Clearing Union (ACU) settlements and a further SWAP of USD 400 million from the Reserve Bank of India. 

In addition, another SWAP from the Bangladesh Bank was obtained for USD 200 million.  All those inflows added up to USD 4,950 million. 
In fact, it was by using these new funds, and the brought forward reserves of the CBSL that the 3 ISBs totalling USD 2,500 million in 2020, 2021 and 2022 plus other maturing debt had been settled, while also providing significant liquidity support of nearly USD 2,000 million to the State Banks, and forex for urgent essential imports of around USD 1,500 million for food, fuel, gas, coal, medicines, etc.

In addition, the Government finalized a trade credit line of USD 1,000 million for oil imports and USD 1,000 million for other essential imports from India and these facilities have already been accessed from late March 2022 onwards. 

Further, based on an appeal from the Sri Lankan President to the Chinese President in January 2022, China had also indicated that it was ready to arrange USD 1,000 million as a liquid finance facility and USD 1,500 million for import financing. In fact, that was officially referred to by China’s Ambassador in Sri Lanka on 17th March 2022 and Sri Lanka’s Ambassador in China on 12th April 2022. On the basis of the above assurances from China and India, further commitments of USD 4,500 million were also assured.  

In addition, it has also been reported at intervals that negotiations with several other Middle Eastern Governments and Central Banks were also on-going and although by the end March 2022, those had not been successful, some of those engagements may still have potential for success in the future.

It may also be noted that the Government’s effort to raise USD 250 million from the partial divestment of West Coast Power, and a further USD 100 million from the partial divestment of the Eastern Terminal of the new Colombo Port, did not bear fruit due to political reasons, although that was also a part of the Government’s plan to raise non-debt inflows. 

It may also be noted that the secondary market for Sri Lankan ISBs was trading at highly elevated levels throughout 2020 and 2021, and it is very unlikely that the Government would have been able to access funds from the international bond markets during that Covid-stricken period, even atexorbitantly high interest rates. Hence, obtaining funds at low single-digit interest rates from bi-lateral sources was the better option, if not the only option, from that point of view as well.

In any event, in the light of the materialised receipts of USD 4,950 million and credible commitments of USD 4,500 million, the decision taken by the Government to pursue its stated path could be justified, since the option of bilateral support and other declared strategies was a lot less controversial and risky than pursuing a tough IMF programme that could have been quite painful to the people (high taxes and interest rates, depreciated currency, sale of national assets, etc) and long-drawn out. 

In fact, the situation would have been grave from about a year ago, if the aforementioned forex inflows had not been arranged by the authorities and the commitments not obtained, whilst only relying on a possible IMF programme, which could have been delayed or dragged on for whatever reason, even if the IMF had been approached an year earlier.

It must also not be forgotten that it was during the period 2015-2019, while following an IMF programme, that the then Government issued an additional net USD 10,000 million of ISBs which could be termed the origin of the current external debt problem. 

As a direct consequence, the Government’s external debt shot up by 65% and forex debt servicing tripled, while the GDP was almost stagnant at around the USD 80 to 84 billion levels. 

Sri Lanka’s external debt problem was further aggravated from 2020 onwards, by about USD 4.5 billion of the country’s annual forex inflows suddenly drying up due to the collapse in tourism, and about USD 1.5 billion reducing in 2021, due to the Hawala proliferation affecting Workers remittances. 

In any event, it must be clearly understood that seeking a programme with the IMF is a decision to be taken by the Cabinet of Ministers, and not by officials. If the Cabinet had taken a policy decision one year or even two years ago to approach the IMF and informed the country of the Government’s intention to do so, the entire governmental machinery including the CBSL and MOF would have complied with that decision. In fact, that happened on 15th March 2022, when the President made the official announcement that the Government would seek an IMF programme. 

Unfortunately, the true situation has been misinterpreted, which explains why the blame is being pinned on the former Governors of the Central Bank, former Secretary to the President, and former Secretary to the Treasury as being responsible” for Sri Lanka not embarking on an IMF programme. They seem to have forgotten that such a decision should have been taken by the Cabinet of Ministers, and not by officials. 

In any event, even at this stage, it may be useful for those persons to familiarize themselves with case studies of past IMF programmes” in similar circumstances in other countries, as well as understand the repercussions of sovereign debt default”. They should probably do that before hailing a possible “IMF programme” and the sovereign debt default” as Sri Lanka’s new panacea for all ills. 

It may still be possible that those steps which are today being hailed, may be the very cause of a very serious, irretrievable and unmanageable economic and social outcome that may haunt Sri Lanka for a long time to come.

https://www.lankaweb.com/news/items/2022/05/14/not-going-to-imf-then-going-to-imf-now-will-sri-lankas-problems-be-solved/

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Reply to topic

Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum