Quiz! Quiz! Quiz!

innam wrote:Purely going by the guy who posted the question, the answer has to be KGAL.

rijayasooriya wrote:

innam wrote:Purely going by the guy who posted the question, the answer has to be KGAL.

Correctly said....!!!!

rijayasooriya wrote:

innam wrote:Purely going by the guy who posted the question, the answer has to be KGAL.

Correctly said....!!!!

Rajitha wrote: this is a perfect example of the state this forum is in now!
Not a single person have mentioned the most fundamentaly sound and lowest PE ratio company in CSE!
Then go on and talk about people picking crappy shares and promoted stuff! I highly recommend specially the coloured people to find their heads from where they stuck and go do some research about CSE than wasting time here!

Rajitha wrote:I'm bored glancing past all the same stupid posts here! So I thought I'll ask a simple question and see how many people here know the answer!

What company has the best trailing PE in CSE ? (Here is a chance for all the fundamental promoters to show their colours! )

mark wrote:

Rajitha wrote:I'm bored glancing past all the same stupid posts here! So I thought I'll ask a simple question and see how many people here know the answer!

What company has the best trailing PE in CSE ? (Here is a chance for all the fundamental promoters to show their colours! )

*hi,do u remmbr my WATA post? I said its ovrvalud,bt u tld its fairly valud..whn its at 30 or ovr i thnk..so u wrong at my analysis.

*its nt gud 2 blame othrs wit hvng less exprnce in CSE.i knw u r less exprncd.

*im nt consdrng PE,I cnsdr the shares which holds its ground in bloody rainy days.i nvr bought DIMO evn wit knwng its value,bcz crowd or players dnt lyk such shares.
*can you provide an analyse of ur prfrd share if you challange the exprncd guy who also my guru.

*my choice is CINS and CTC.. I bet you on these counters..

*stil im inexprncd,so i may be wrong..

Rajitha wrote: this is a perfect example of the state this forum is in now!
Not a single person have mentioned the most fundamentaly sound and lowest PE ratio company in CSE!
Then go on and talk about people picking crappy shares and promoted stuff! I highly recommend specially the coloured people to find their heads from where they stuck and go do some research about CSE than wasting time here!

Rajitha wrote: this is a perfect example of the state this forum is in now!
Not a single person have mentioned the most fundamentaly sound and lowest PE ratio company in CSE!
Then go on and talk about people picking crappy shares and promoted stuff! I highly recommend specially the coloured people to find their heads from where they stuck and go do some research about CSE than wasting time here!

slstock wrote:

Rajitha wrote: this is a perfect example of the state this forum is in now!
Not a single person have mentioned the most fundamentaly sound and lowest PE ratio company in CSE!
Then go on and talk about people picking crappy shares and promoted stuff! I highly recommend specially the coloured people to find their heads from where they stuck and go do some research about CSE than wasting time here!

Anyway what is the big deal is people gave a different answer? They tried. We are all learning.

Rajitha, I wish you are more modest at times. I like you nice post but bad comment. This is synonymous to inviting people to you house and then insulting : asking a question and when the answer is different ridicule. I hope that you be more modest if you want to get replies to your post.

rijayasooriya wrote:

innam wrote:Purely going by the guy who posted the question, the answer has to be KGAL.

Correctly said....!!!!

Kithsiri wrote:It is better if some forum members come to the term that, now it is the time to dismount from the “I Only Know All” horse and treating others as equals and with respect.

Kumar wrote:I couldn't get the answer from the comments made by each and everyone. ( May be I'm not that much sharp?)
So Rajitha can you tell me what is the answer?

Rajitha wrote:

Kumar wrote:I couldn't get the answer from the comments made by each and everyone. ( May be I'm not that much sharp?)
So Rajitha can you tell me what is the answer?

OFEQ

Definition of 'Price-Earnings Ratio - P/E Ratio'
A valuation ratio of a company's current share price compared to its per-share earnings.

Calculated as:

Market Value per Share
Earnings per Share (EPS)


For example, if a company is currently trading at $43 a share and earnings over the last 12 months were $1.95 per share, the P/E ratio for the stock would be 22.05 ($43/$1.95).

EPS is usually from the last four quarters (trailing P/E), but sometimes it can be taken from the estimates of earnings expected in the next four quarters (projected or forward P/E). A third variation uses the sum of the last two actual quarters and the estimates of the next two quarters.

Also sometimes known as "price multiple" or "earnings multiple".


Investopedia explains 'Price-Earnings Ratio - P/E Ratio'
In general, a high P/E suggests that investors are expecting higher earnings growth in the future compared to companies with a lower P/E. However, the P/E ratio doesn't tell us the whole story by itself. It's usually more useful to compare the P/E ratios of one company to other companies in the same industry, to the market in general or against the company's own historical P/E. It would not be useful for investors using the P/E ratio as a basis for their investment to compare the P/E of a technology company (high P/E) to a utility company (low P/E) as each industry has much different growth prospects.

The P/E is sometimes referred to as the "multiple", because it shows how much investors are willing to pay per dollar of earnings. If a company were currently trading at a multiple (P/E) of 20, the interpretation is that an investor is willing to pay $20 for $1 of current earnings.

It is important that investors note an important problem that arises with the P/E measure, and to avoid basing a decision on this measure alone. The denominator (earnings) is based on an accounting measure of earnings that is susceptible to forms of manipulation, making the quality of the P/E only as good as the quality of the underlying earnings number.


Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/price-earningsratio.asp#ixzz1gtXYAUeu

Rajaraam wrote:

kumar,

I fully agree with your comment.For the last 12months only 100 shares have been sold. If somebody sells now that will be a very high price. That indicates the ordeer book. What we are interested are shares those are trading at present. As you correcly said you cant calculate PE for OFEQ as you cant find a current market price.

It is realy a waste of time. Good for entertainment.