Gaja,
I already hinted one possible reason ;-)
Gaja wrote:Am not certain about the dividend, but one thing i noted in the last few days they wanted to achieve more than 75%, now they did it! but what is the intention behind it?
Encyclopedia of Latest news, reviews, discussions and analysis of stock market and investment opportunities in Sri Lanka
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Gaja wrote:Am not certain about the dividend, but one thing i noted in the last few days they wanted to achieve more than 75%, now they did it! but what is the intention behind it?
slstock wrote:
Gaja,
I already hinted one possible reason ;-)Gaja wrote:Am not certain about the dividend, but one thing i noted in the last few days they wanted to achieve more than 75%, now they did it! but what is the intention behind it?
Gaja wrote:slstock wrote:
Gaja,
I already hinted one possible reason ;-)Gaja wrote:Am not certain about the dividend, but one thing i noted in the last few days they wanted to achieve more than 75%, now they did it! but what is the intention behind it?
Are u referring this
Hmm, sadly I sold my KGAL for a need but KGAL is real value share in the sector. Hmm is RPC looking at a hidden asset in KGAL ;-) ?
salt wrote:@slstock,
Such a long explanation. To be frank, this whole argument about wage is fallacy
It's nothing extraordinary, this plantation industry is one of the oldest industry & wage has been going up throughout the history. We knew about this since our childhood. Industry is however coping with it.
I agree with you on rest of the thing..
Chinwi wrote:
Few weeks ago, I did some rough study on paper for some plantation companies to see whether there is a mammoth impact in their outcome due to this wage issue.
Surprisingly the impact by the so called wage devil was negligible for some companies. There were some other reasons for up and down in time to time in their bottom-line.
salt wrote:@slstock,
Such a long explanation. To be frank, this whole argument about wage is fallacy
It's nothing extraordinary, this plantation industry is one of the oldest industry & wage has been going up throughout the history. We knew about this since our childhood. Industry is however coping with it.
I agree with you on rest of the thing..
innam wrote:How did you come up with a figure of 72 per share?
The ST and Cash balance is 2.4 billion which works out to 95 per share but out of this the debt load of 1.1 billion should be deducted leaving a net cash balance of 1.26 billion which 50 per share in cash (big difference from 72 per share headline)
cse.alpha wrote:Interesting discussion
is the math correct though ?
Kegalle:KGAL has 25 m shares
Short term investments and cash as at 31Dec2012 was Rs2.39 b - that is, 95 rupees cash per share
but you should deduct borrowings and work out net cash per share
Loans were Rs992 m and Rs148 m as at 31Dec2012 - this gives net cash of Rs1.3 b or 50 rupees net cash per share
This is still more than enough to pay last year's dividend of Rs7.5 per share - will a special extra dividend be paid is the key issue
Parent Richard Pieris has used part of KGAL's cash in past two years to invest in new group companies Arpico Insurance and Richard Pieris Arpico Finance - more of the same is possible
But They Have Retain Earning 120-130 Per ShareTeller wrote:We can claim the loss from CSE. This is not the first mistake from them. Same thing happend Some years ago. How ever kgal is in a position to pay 4.50,
Go to page : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum