NAWALOKA HOSPITALS PLC (NHL.N0000)

Redbulls wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:

Whitebull wrote:
But the problem is the intention behind the agenda....Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country but Yours is for separatism and well being of one ethnic group of this country.

These days, we here so much about "UNITARY STATE " in newspapers, speeches of politicians, religious dignatories etc. First time I saw this word in any post in this Forum.
I am puzzled , what it really means ?

Physical boundaries of a country / state ....is it a static thing ?
I have heard the present USA is a coalition of 13 previously separate states. Even they have one country ( Louisiana ? ) from France. In Europe ,country boundaries have changed so many times.

Just search the internet with the phrase....You can easily get the general meaning of unitary state. But when we come to the fine things there are controversies in opinions.

Searched, got some idea. Thanks.
Actually the interest (of the word) originated due to your statement above........."Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country "
It is clear there are tensions, problems among communities in this country.
The way the things have developed now, we may have to consider changing the unitary nature of the state, if we are for the "well being of all the communities of this country" . Are we prepared to consider this option ?
I am asking this , because as "investors " we prefer to look at a issue rationally keeping aside ideological, emotional bondage's.

I do not think unitariness does affect the well being of all the communities. As an example look in to the situation of Colombo. All the communities live harmonically without much problems. Even when LTTE terrorists brutally killed innocent people did Sinhala people attack the tamil community ? Sinhalese are usually non-violence people. They like to live peacefully. Most of the tamil people are also same. Problem is tamil racism of diaspora and tamil politicians. I do not say our politicians are pure white. Unfortunate incident in 1983 was due to shortsightedness of Sinhala politicians.
If those tamil politicians get rid of the tamil racism with separatism we all can live in this country harmonically. Main problem here is tamil racism nothing else.

Don't to be a joker.
1958,1977,1983 riots against tamils were planned and engineered by those who came from other planet?
To cover your leaders s***, do not bluff, we know very well about your intention also.

Whitebull wrote:

Redbulls wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:[quote="Whitebull"
But the problem is the intention behind the agenda....Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country but Yours is for separatism and well being of one ethnic group of this country.

These days, we here so much about "UNITARY STATE " in newspapers, speeches of politicians, religious dignatories etc. First time I saw this word in any post in this Forum.
I am puzzled , what it really means ?

Physical boundaries of a country / state ....is it a static thing ?
I have heard the present USA is a coalition of 13 previously separate states. Even they have one country ( Louisiana ? ) from France. In Europe ,country boundaries have changed so many times.

Just search the internet with the phrase....You can easily get the general meaning of unitary state. But when we come to the fine things there are controversies in opinions.

Searched, got some idea. Thanks.
Actually the interest (of the word) originated due to your statement above........."Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country "
It is clear there are tensions, problems among communities in this country.
The way the things have developed now, we may have to consider changing the unitary nature of the state, if we are for the "well being of all the communities of this country" . Are we prepared to consider this option ?
I am asking this , because as "investors " we prefer to look at a issue rationally keeping aside ideological, emotional bondage's.

Redbulls wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

Redbulls wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:

Whitebull wrote:
But the problem is the intention behind the agenda....Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country but Yours is for separatism and well being of one ethnic group of this country.

These days, we here so much about "UNITARY STATE " in newspapers, speeches of politicians, religious dignatories etc. First time I saw this word in any post in this Forum.
I am puzzled , what it really means ?

Physical boundaries of a country / state ....is it a static thing ?
I have heard the present USA is a coalition of 13 previously separate states. Even they have one country ( Louisiana ? ) from France. In Europe ,country boundaries have changed so many times.

Just search the internet with the phrase....You can easily get the general meaning of unitary state. But when we come to the fine things there are controversies in opinions.

Searched, got some idea. Thanks.
Actually the interest (of the word) originated due to your statement above........."Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country "
It is clear there are tensions, problems among communities in this country.
The way the things have developed now, we may have to consider changing the unitary nature of the state, if we are for the "well being of all the communities of this country" . Are we prepared to consider this option ?
I am asking this , because as "investors " we prefer to look at a issue rationally keeping aside ideological, emotional bondage's.

I do not think unitariness does affect the well being of all the communities. As an example look in to the situation of Colombo. All the communities live harmonically without much problems. Even when LTTE terrorists brutally killed innocent people did Sinhala people attack the tamil community ? Sinhalese are usually non-violence people. They like to live peacefully. Most of the tamil people are also same. Problem is tamil racism of diaspora and tamil politicians. I do not say our politicians are pure white. Unfortunate incident in 1983 was due to shortsightedness of Sinhala politicians.
If those tamil politicians get rid of the tamil racism with separatism we all can live in this country harmonically. Main problem here is tamil racism nothing else.

Don't to be a joker.
1958,1977,1983 riots against tamils were planned and engineered by those who came from other planet?
To cover your leaders s***, do not bluff, we know very well about your intention also.

If you have tiny bit of brain you should understand that the main problem here is nothing other than the tamil racism. Those incidents are unwise methods used by Sinhala politicians due to Tamil racism. Unfortunately you can not even understand my intention as you are also blind with tamil racism and your hidden agenda towards separatism.
My posts in these type of threads are not to address people like you but to mention the insight of this problem to Sinhala people and to people with balanced mind because these people have been mislead by false version of this problem.

In this forum for the speculative shares we do have couple of jokers in different ID.
For political you are the only one and one.
Go and read the news in daily papers most of your leaders are the main racist. Before pointing finger blindly to other communities, think carefully there are threefingers pointing towards you.
I know arguing with stupids who are pretending intelligent is vain.
That is similar to giving as tick to the barking stary dog.
So better to say bye for now.

Whitebull wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

Redbulls wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:

Whitebull wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:

Whitebull wrote:
But the problem is the intention behind the agenda....Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country but Yours is for separatism and well being of one ethnic group of this country.

These days, we here so much about "UNITARY STATE " in newspapers, speeches of politicians, religious dignatories etc. First time I saw this word in any post in this Forum.
I am puzzled , what it really means ?

Physical boundaries of a country / state ....is it a static thing ?
I have heard the present USA is a coalition of 13 previously separate states. Even they have one country ( Louisiana ? ) from France. In Europe ,country boundaries have changed so many times.

Just search the internet with the phrase....You can easily get the general meaning of unitary state. But when we come to the fine things there are controversies in opinions.

Searched, got some idea. Thanks.
Actually the interest (of the word) originated due to your statement above........."Mine is for unitary and well being of all the communities of this country "
It is clear there are tensions, problems among communities in this country.
The way the things have developed now, we may have to consider changing the unitary nature of the state, if we are for the "well being of all the communities of this country" . Are we prepared to consider this option ?
I am asking this , because as "investors " we prefer to look at a issue rationally keeping aside ideological, emotional bondage's.

I do not think unitariness does affect the well being of all the communities. As an example look in to the situation of Colombo. All the communities live harmonically without much problems. Even when LTTE terrorists brutally killed innocent people did Sinhala people attack the tamil community ? Sinhalese are usually non-violence people. They like to live peacefully. Most of the tamil people are also same. Problem is tamil racism of diaspora and tamil politicians. I do not say our politicians are pure white. Unfortunate incident in 1983 was due to shortsightedness of Sinhala politicians.
If those tamil politicians get rid of the tamil racism with separatism we all can live in this country harmonically. Main problem here is tamil racism nothing else.

Jamez wrote:

knockknobbler wrote:

VISA wrote:I ask about impact on nawaloka share price ????

Please explain... why you don't take it seriously... I own a few shares.... should I be concerned about this investment...

RJ1010 wrote:Hospital was doing quite poorly earlier this year prior to covid they didn’t have budgets to upgrade their maternity ward. During past 6 months they were assigned to do PCR testing for repatriation flights arriving at the airport. Didn’t read the financial statements and overall group performance. Maybe someone can comment on that.