My views on the locked post titled "Note to members from a former admin.

@SHARK - I am simply pointing out to you, bringing to your notice, that what was posted by GMNet was a paragraph of an article posted by slstock somewhere in cyberspace. GMNet purposely, and with mischievous intent, quoted para out of context here in this forum, for which you had sought clarrification from slstock and now from some other members. We are not your servants or minions to provide you information. The onus is on you, as a co-administator of this forum, to get to the bottom of this. you can do so by 

1. calling for an explanation from GMNet as to the source of this post.

2. Verify yourself as you have the neccessary resources in hand.    

either way, it is crystal clear to me that GMNet has acted with malicious intent to cause harm to slstock reputation and you are complicit in not taking any action such as banning GMNet. instead you are stalling and marking time using stupid excuses such as asking for complete post etc from others. 

Sadly, you are showing your colours and i am seeing yellow......

This will cause immeasurable damage to your reputation as a technical analyst as who would want to believe / trust someone with arcane technical analytical market calls, when their integrity as a human being, is in question. 

So I urge you to take prompt action of investigating matter yourself and take appropriate action. 

For me, nothing short of banning GMNet for this injustice will suffice. 

I hope and trust at least now you will do the correct thing.

sashimaal wrote:I remember someone called TAH telling me in the other forum he will not put ASI charts unless SLStock tells him... Yeah, D.Silva syndrome

Shark - selecting which forum you should be in your choice. But don't fall to these low levels where you defend GMNet, etc.

Where are they now? You are defending them onbehalf of SLEF !

Please dont confuse when you say i am defending any one in this Forum. I will defend what is right and not what is wrong.

Yes as i said i went and returned and will continue to educate the retailers in this capacity.....and not to jeopardise the forum.

See the power of GMnet money. If he utters a word that is negative to GMnet he'll be discarded by the Gmnet mistress

jonta999 wrote:See the power of GMnet money. If he utters a word that is negative to GMnet he'll be discarded by the Gmnet mistress

TAH is thinking he can profit from SLEF for his future plans but SLEF using his greediness for the time being.

The Alchemist wrote:@SHARK - I am simply pointing out to you, bringing to your notice, that what was posted by GMNet was a paragraph of an article posted by slstock somewhere in cyberspace. GMNet purposely, and with mischievous intent, quoted para out of context here in this forum, for which you had sought clarrification from slstock and now from some other members. We are not your servants or minions to provide you information. The onus is on you, as a co-administator of this forum, to get to the bottom of this. you can do so by 

1. calling for an explanation from GMNet as to the source of this post.

2. Verify yourself as you have the neccessary resources in hand.    

either way, it is crystal clear to me that GMNet has acted with malicious intent to cause harm to slstock reputation and you are complicit in not taking any action such as banning GMNet. instead you are stalling and marking time using stupid excuses such as asking for complete post etc from others. 

Sadly, you are showing your colours and i am seeing yellow......

This will cause immeasurable damage to your reputation as a technical analyst as who would want to believe / trust someone with arcane technical analytical market calls, when their integrity as a human being, is in question. 

So I urge you to take prompt action of investigating matter yourself and take appropriate action. 

For me, nothing short of banning GMNet for this injustice will suffice. 

I hope and trust at least now you will do the correct thing.

As Admin's we have the right to ban GMNet. If necessary me and SHARK, have no hesitation in banning GMnet. But before we take that decision, we need to get reasons from past members about the wrongdoing of GMNet. Then only we could take a unbiased decision. Appreciate if you guys including Slstock could give some reasons as to why we should ban GMNet.

The way the new GMnet treated all the senior members especially SLS is it right Mr. Shark????

Yes you are the real GMnet my dear Sstar

Dear All

These follows try to increase the traffic, by low grade activities like this, don't waste ur time

kas wrote:The way the new GMnet treated all the senior members especially SLS is it right Mr. Shark????

When GMNet was treating most of the senior members with ARIMA, TAH left the forum saying good bye. So he couldn't follow the threads or posts like now he couldn't go back to that forum (where he is still a respectable(?) member) and read SLStock post.

Top Trader wrote:Dear All

These follows try to increase the traffic, by low grade activities like this, don't waste ur time

You are 100% right but sometimes we need to do this type of service to unmask them.

SHARK wrote:

jonta999 wrote:Poor fella's reputation gone to dogs...And Gment's money is speaking here

PLease dont stoop into such level.   

Dont bring wild accusations ..... Please

I am doing a voluntary service

SHARK

Please ask who requested money   

@Sstar

Please confirm whether i have requested a single penny from SLEF or have i opened money matters .....

Thanks

SHARK wrote:

SHARK wrote:

jonta999 wrote:Poor fella's reputation gone to dogs...And Gment's money is speaking here

PLease dont stoop into such level.   

Dont bring wild accusations ..... Please

I am doing a voluntary service

SHARK

Please ask  who requested money   

@Sstar

Please confirm whether i have requested a single penny from SLEF or have i opened money matters .....

Thanks

So cat is out. Sstar is your boss means GMNet........
(basic knowledge is enough to understand 1=1 no?)

All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources, management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

Sstar wrote:All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources,  management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

 In hindsight, it would have been better to having paid those previous guys, as the quality discipline etc they maintained was top class.
Now we can see that by removing the geese that laid the golden egg, the quality, integrity, legitimacy etc of this forum has going to the dogs. 

They say good things no cheap, cheap things no good. 

We see that very clearly here.

Sstar wrote:All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources,  management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

One lie to cover another Keep going. Remember there is something called "Karma" in this world which one of us could get away. The people I know as SLS or small were never of that nature. I m putting this comment for the eyes of newcomers. Anyone who want to know could go to the older threads and see the attitudes of these seniors or else they could visit the other forum

The Alchemist wrote:

Sstar wrote:All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources,  management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

 In hindsight, it would have been better to having paid those previous guys, as the quality discipline etc they maintained was top class.
Now we can see that by removing the geese that laid the golden egg, the quality, integrity, legitimacy etc of this forum has going to the dogs. 

They say good things no cheap, cheap things no good. 

We see that very clearly here.

Well said mate, but suspecting whether they can understand your comments. (Came to that conclusion during today's discussion on two threads)

kas wrote:

Sstar wrote:All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources,  management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

One lie to cover another Keep going. Remember there is something called "Karma" in this world which one of us could get away. The people I know as SLS or small were never of that nature. I m putting this comment for the eyes of newcomers. Anyone who want to know could go to the older threads and see the attitudes of these seniors or else they could visit the other forum

Haven't you seen enough complains from Slstock and Smallville already in the other forum that they are wasting their valuable time. So I have no reason to suspect whether the management is telling the truth or not.

Sstar wrote:

kas wrote:

Sstar wrote:All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources,  management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

One lie to cover another Keep going. Remember there is something called "Karma" in this world which one of us could get away. The people I know as SLS or small were never of that nature. I m putting this comment for the eyes of newcomers. Anyone who want to know could go to the older threads and see the attitudes of these seniors or else they could visit the other forum

Haven't you seen enough complains from Slstock and Smallville already in the other forum that they are wasting their valuable time. So I have no reason to suspect whether the management is telling the truth or not.

Noo they were not asking for money they had issues about the way they were treated by the new management

Sstar wrote:

kas wrote:

Sstar wrote:All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources,  management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

One lie to cover another Keep going. Remember there is something called "Karma" in this world which one of us could get away. The people I know as SLS or small were never of that nature. I m putting this comment for the eyes of newcomers. Anyone who want to know could go to the older threads and see the attitudes of these seniors or else they could visit the other forum

Haven't you seen enough complains from Slstock and Smallville already in the other forum that they are wasting their valuable time. So I have no reason to suspect whether the management is telling the truth or not.

I think that management will decide to pay handsomely i am sure former admins were not risking mere pittance leave out and joining another planet. Okaay So this was all about ........ The cat is out of the bag and now jumped & went out of the window .....

kas wrote:

Sstar wrote:

kas wrote:

Sstar wrote:All Moderators and Administrators of Sri Lanka Equity Forum work on voluntary basis. According to sources,  management had a difficulty with the previous Administrators namely Slstock and Smallville because they continuously complained about their free service and wanted the owners to consider a reasonable compensation package for their services. However as a company policy no such payment was offered or paid to them.

One lie to cover another Keep going. Remember there is something called "Karma" in this world which one of us could get away. The people I know as SLS or small were never of that nature. I m putting this comment for the eyes of newcomers. Anyone who want to know could go to the older threads and see the attitudes of these seniors or else they could visit the other forum

Haven't you seen enough complains from Slstock and Smallville already in the other forum that they are wasting their valuable time. So I have no reason to suspect whether the management is telling the truth or not.

Noo they were not asking for money they had issues about the way they were treated by the new  management

Are you so sure Kas. In the Market Cycle this known the denial phase ..... poor retailers keep shorting in BULL run or vice versa, by the time they realise Elvis has left the Building

Ayyo what happened to the power of the Fib on achchi man? He used to be such a nice achchi, now he is accused of taking money and a monthly salary from the powerful GMNet, what will the forum users think about the fib on achchi.

Shark - Is that what the SLEF Management who gobbled the advertising and other revenue made by the hard work of SLStock, Smallville, you, etc made you to believe?

sashimaal wrote:Shark - Is that what the SLEF Management who gobbled the advertising and other revenue made by the hard work of SLStock, Smallville, you, etc made you to believe?

can you elaborate on this a bit i did not get the question sorry

Jiggy - Yes, Shark is a very capable person who can contribute a lot to the society. He should not fall into this level by defending what happened.

SHARK wrote:
I think that management will decide to pay handsomely i am sure former admins were not risking mere pittance leave out and joining another planet. Okaay So this was all about ........ The cat is out of the bag and now jumped & went out of the window .....

I was waiting for this, now I can see your real face.

Keep it up mate.

One day you'll also be on the same boat and new member designated as co-admin will say the same to us about you.

Did the Management made you believe the earlier Admins were after money and the issues arose from that?

Didn't they tell about how much money they made from advertising and other revenue from their+your+others' contribution?

SHARK wrote:

sashimaal wrote:Shark - Is that what the SLEF Management who gobbled the advertising and other revenue made by the hard work of SLStock, Smallville, you, etc made you to believe?

can you elaborate on this a bit i did not get the question sorry

Jiggysaurus wrote:Ayyo what happened to the power of the Fib on achchi man? He used to be such a nice achchi, now he is accused of taking money and a monthly salary from the powerful GMNet, what will the forum users think about the fib on achchi.

The man has been vilified accused of demanding money from SLEF management all because for being straight and asking direct questions where it matters ......

  

sashimaal wrote:Jiggy - Yes, Shark is a very capable person who can contribute a lot to the society. He should not fall into this level by defending what happened.

But fib on achchi man is fully suportive of the new pro positive forum and he seems to be very happy with the powerful GMNet.

Who knows on day fib on achchi man might become Chief Technical Officer of SIRA. That way no more inventory will get lost. TAH has very powerful charts.

sashimaal wrote:Did the Management made you believe the earlier Admins were after money and the issues arose from that?

Didn't they tell about how much money they made from advertising and other revenue from their+your+others' contribution?

SHARK wrote:

sashimaal wrote:Shark - Is that what the SLEF Management who gobbled the advertising and other revenue made by the hard work of SLStock, Smallville, you, etc made you to believe?

can you elaborate on this a bit i did not get the question sorry

Dear Sash,

Its not my business how much money they make, its about 11000 members i have to look in when a forum is left HIGH and DRY all of a sudden.
You seem to have forgotten the events that led to this whole saga, are you purposely denying it.

Its like in french "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche"   
Shark

  Shark hasn't done technical analysis for a long time.

He has been busy with these things...it's like Muralitharan trying to be a pace bowler

Jiggysaurus wrote:

sashimaal wrote:Jiggy - Yes, Shark is a very capable person who can contribute a lot to the society. He should not fall into this level by defending what happened.

But fib on achchi man is fully suportive of the new pro positive forum and he seems to be very happy with the powerful GMNet.

Who knows on day fib on achchi man might become Chief Technical Officer of SIRA. That way no more inventory will get lost. TAH has very powerful charts.