Posts = 58 & Reputation = 100. How can this possible?

no offense mate. I'm thinking how come this possible? There are so many members explain in depth details about stocks but dont get this kind of posts to rep ratio. How this possible? Tell me. Thanks

Please read the forum help section regarding points and reputation. This question has been answered many timez in the forum. Please do not post without reading or searching the forum for previous posts. Search button is available in many places within the forum.

Quibit wrote:Please read the forum help section regarding points and reputation

Thanks for the response Quibit. I understood very clearly how the Reps calculate. But my question is this guy a genius to get this many reps for such a small number of posts?

I will ask moderators to look into the matter.

Quibit wrote:I will ask moderators to look into the matter.

Thanks a lot Quibit

Any sort of reputation scheme or points awarding system is not 100% perfect.
The system now in place is just to give the members a rough idea of the member who contributes and the level of experience and acceptance by the members in general.
There are excellent comments made by some members but not picked up due to the lack of communication skills.

There may be others who have a good number of friends on this forum and they {may} be givings + Reps indiscriminately. That can never be traced and challenged on the forum. What I suggest is that let it be for a while. Who cares much about the number of reps a particular 'King' has or a 'queen' does not have. The big question is does that person make sense? Is he want to get an inner sense of satisfaction by getting undue credit.

If any member is trying anything funny, the moderators will deal with him over time. You may request him for some pertinent information on what he had stated in the post and move on from there. Sifting is taking place and the chaff will disappear. Those who really want to do business on the CSE will contribute information that is worthwhile and not negative.

So members, please your right of choice with care and refrain from bringing discredit to this forum.

We cannot go to any other forum as all are investors check this forum prior to investing. If we want the world to invest in CSE, then we better behave at least now.

He's the guys behind the topic "Is this going to be another lackadaisical web forum" where he tried to entighten the promotional activities and may have colelcted the reps by doing so..
As Hybris_OS mentioned, its not the number of +s a person gets matters, its the value addition he brings in to the forum..

why he dont deserve it?just bcoz of that he pointed out the failures?
my idea is he deserve it,i may be wrong.......
btw quality of posts worth than the reputation points as small pointed out,any person have the right to vote as to his knowledge..
we want manipulation free forum
will see who agree

Actually Some guy has been spamming + votes for me in the past week or so as well!

I had to work so hard to get those negative rep from the ignorant always wrong people! They were a testament to how wrong the majority were and how right I was ! Now I will have the same reps like the rest of mutual back scratching share promoting lot who are still slaves to the old promoted stocks and their thinking!

Please who ever been spamming those votes stop it! I enjoy those negative rep more!!

The original poster of this thread is an admirer of SL.Market. See following thread for his comment. He says “Sl.Market I like your style. Please keep posting.”

http://forum.srilankaequity.com/t5142p20-smlln-trading-below-44#38196

As glwking went against SL.Market, this person cannot tolerate him getting this much of positive reputation points. It is merely a petty personal issue. I don’t know why we should bother responding.

mark wrote:why he dont deserve it?just bcoz of that he pointed out the failures?
my idea is he deserve it,i may be wrong.......
btw quality of posts worth than the reputation points as small pointed out,any person have the right to vote as to his knowledge..
we want manipulation free forum
will see who agree

Hi dude, if he deserves that many reps for few posts then people like slstock, smallville innam etc should have 1000s of reps.

Carolis wrote:

mark wrote:why he dont deserve it?just bcoz of that he pointed out the failures?
my idea is he deserve it,i may be wrong.......
btw quality of posts worth than the reputation points as small pointed out,any person have the right to vote as to his knowledge..
we want manipulation free forum
will see who agree

Hi dude, if he deserves that many reps for few posts then people like slstock, smallville innam etc should have 1000s of reps.

hehehe, you dont now mate how much reps i have given to those people,those are my teachers.respect them very much,you have just only gave 85 +reps up to now..
btw there is many posts which really deserve +reps,specially my guru smallville....slstock,small..etc are gems for this forum....
hope you ddnt jumbled up people who deserve reps
good luck

mark wrote:

Carolis wrote:

mark wrote:why he dont deserve it?just bcoz of that he pointed out the failures?
my idea is he deserve it,i may be wrong.......
btw quality of posts worth than the reputation points as small pointed out,any person have the right to vote as to his knowledge..
we want manipulation free forum
will see who agree

Hi dude, if he deserves that many reps for few posts then people like slstock, smallville innam etc should have 1000s of reps.

hehehe, you dont now mate how much reps i have given to those people,those are my teachers.respect them very much,you have just only gave 85 +reps up to now..
btw there is many posts which really deserve +reps,specially my guru smallville....slstock,small..etc are gems for this forum....
hope you ddnt jumbled up people who deserve reps
good luck

Hi Mark please get my point. If I can learn something from someone I always give + reps. For me glwking's reps look very very unusual. Thats the only point I want to tell. If you think glwkings reps normal then slstock should have more than 5000 reps.

Even I was wondering I how I got this much reputation points. In fact I have commented in one of my post too. Honestly I don't any expect reputation point. In reality I am not going to contest election from this reputation points.

My humble request to Admin & moderators. Please remove my reputation points and make it to zero.

Hi Guys and gals if this rep point is making such a big issue why don’t you restrict one rep point per day per person. So an individual can only vote for the best posting he/she thinks for the day

Investor99 wrote:Hi Guys and gals if this rep point is making such a big issue why don’t you restrict one rep point per day per person. So an individual can only vote for the best posting he/she thinks for the day

Not a bad suggestion....But it is really an unnecessary thing to keep on discussing this reputation.
This like that sms thing in tv channels

I don"t know why this members are fighting for a small things like school children. Market has fallen and all the members portfolio is red and we have to see how we can cover over loss at least if possible. No matter who wrote what in the forum, u must have a brain to decide that other wise you will loose your money and not mine. For me this is very useful web forum and i have some members in mind writing good valuable topics and mostly i am concentrate on those topics only. Same time i agree this forum has to free from manipulators and rubbish. Hope moderators will do their work.

Rajitha wrote:Actually Some guy has been spamming + votes for me in the past week or so as well!

I had to work so hard to get those negative rep from the ignorant always wrong people! They were a testament to how wrong the majority were and how right I was ! Now I will have the same reps like the rest of mutual back scratching share promoting lot who are still slaves to the old promoted stocks and their thinking!

Please who ever been spamming those votes stop it! I enjoy those negative rep more!!

No matter how much we argue. I always wanted to see you in + rep region. So gave few chances but man it was a very hard rescue mission

Rajitha wrote:Actually Some guy has been spamming + votes for me in the past week or so as well!



Please who ever been spamming those votes stop it! I enjoy those negative rep more!!

Just for that you get a +rep.

Rajitha wrote:Actually Some guy has been spamming + votes for me in the past week or so as well!

I had to work so hard to get those negative rep from the ignorant always wrong people! They were a testament to how wrong the majority were and how right I was ! Now I will have the same reps like the rest of mutual back scratching share promoting lot who are still slaves to the old promoted stocks and their thinking!

Please who ever been spamming those votes stop it! I enjoy those negative rep more!!

Carolis wrote:no offense mate. I'm thinking how come this possible? There are so many members explain in depth details about stocks but dont get this kind of posts to rep ratio. How this possible? Tell me. Thanks

This can be possible when someone trying to revealing about a stock or about a person.
In invest***.uk some lads and zingas pushed PCH to 30 using repeated posts. Many investors who bought PCH at that price are very much angry with Nizams and they will give many + to posts against Nizams. Zinga you are out here

Indranige nandamma wrote:

Carolis wrote:no offense mate. I'm thinking how come this possible? There are so many members explain in depth details about stocks but dont get this kind of posts to rep ratio. How this possible? Tell me. Thanks

This can be possible when someone trying to revealing about a stock or about a person.
In invest***.uk some lads and zingas pushed PCH to 30 using repeated posts. Many investors who bought PCH at that price are very much angry with Nizams and they will give many + to posts against Nizams. Zinga you are out here

Nice username friend. Let us hope ur LELI will act intelligently.

Thanks alot for whoever gave me - reps for just for show something unusual. Even someone tried to say I support SL Market & thats why I opened this title. So simply go against with the flow I got - reps. You have to go with the flow to get + reps not the quality. Some gives + reps just because the other guy is a friend of yours or a result of an argument. Again not for Quality of the post. Crazy world.

Carolis wrote:Thanks alot for whoever gave me - reps for just for show something unusual. Even someone tried to say I support SL Market & thats why I opened this title. So simply go against with the flow I got - reps. You have to go with the flow to get + reps not the quality. Some gives + reps just because the other guy is a friend of yours or a result of an argument. Again not for Quality of the post. Crazy world.

Hey Bro, you may be right on this..I don't know....but for me this is an utter waste of time...